|
|
||
|
Editorial |
||
|
Finally, a safer wall system?
by Mark Cipolloni When we wrote our Safer walls, please! article back in 1996 we asked the racing community to respond to the challenge of designing an alternative to the rigid concrete walls that have killed or permanently injured many drivers. We think Eurointernational may have come up with the best solution to date with its Impact Protection System (IPS). |
|
Autocourse CART Yearbook 1999-2000 List Price: Our Price: $24.47 You Save:$10.48 (30%)
|
|
Go to our forums to discuss this article |
Others by Mark |
|
|
Introduction oval tracks, motorcycle tracks, horse racing tracks and public roads The IPS is the result of five years of research, studies, test and modifications. This barrier has the official approval of the FIA and has just recently received authorization to be used experimentally at FIA approved tracks. It is the only barrier to have received such approval. To date a few other barrier systems have been tried, but they have had mixed results. This barrier has also been approved by the FIK (Karting) and FIM (motorcycles). Because of these approvals the barrier is meeting with overnight acceptance from the racing community around the world:
Facts about the IPS
Test Criteria The FIA test criteria was developed with just this in mind. It stipulates that the barrier perform in both 60 km/h (37.29 mph) and 80 km/h (50 mph) head-on impact tests with a 800 kg car. Those speeds sound low for a race car, but in fact they are not. A head-on crash into an immovable barrier at 50 mph is usually lethal. As a point of reference, in Jeff Andretti's horrifying accident at Indianapolis in the early 90's whereby the vehicle impacted the wall head-on, the speed of the car at the time of impact was under 60 mph. Michael Schumacher's crash last year that broke both his legs was slower than that. We have seen numerous severe neck and back injuries from rear impacts of IRL cars against concrete barriers at what appear to be relatively low speeds. However, because the concrete barriers are immovable, the driver still experiences very high g-forces over a very short period of time, the worst case scenario. Test Results - FIA Head-on impact test
CART's position We spoke with CART's Kirk Russell about this issue at length. He told us that both CART and the FIA are looking at the various options available, including the IPS barrier. They want to be certain that they don't fix one problem but create another one. CART does not have any design or test criteria for safety barriers or deformable structures, deferring instead to the FIA standards. Kirk was of the understanding that the FIA may have a new barrier recommendation later this year. I'm of the opinion that should the IPS barrier perform well under real-life accidents this race season, it very well may be that the IPS barrier will become the barrier of choice by the FIA, at least until another company can develop something equal or better. Kirk did admit that he had not yet had the chance to review the IPS test data in detail, but his initial impression was that it would be best used at the end of existing barriers. That, however, is not the real intent of the IPS barrier. It is meant to sit in front of the full length of a rigid concrete barrier....anywhere. Safety is not only about cushioned concrete walls. It is a total package. The cars and equipment must be as safe as possible. Car, driver’s clothing, and helmet manufacturers must continue to improve the safety of their products. Kirk also made mention that the driver must be preconditioned for impact. He said CART was looking at the Hanns Device used by Sprint car drivers to reduce the g-force loading on the drivers neck and spine when the cars flip violently. It attaches the drivers helmet to a collar that attaches to the drivers seatbelts. The collar is a carbon fiber appliance that rests between the seat belts and the drivers uniform. CART is also following closely the research being done at Wayne State University. Conclusions When it comes to meeting current FIA criteria, right now the IPS may be the only game in town. Lab testing is fine, but until the IPS is evaluated over a period of time in real life crashes, we won't know just how good this product will perform. Eurointernational tells us their test results indicate that it will perform very well. They base their opinion on the fact that the barrier passed the difficult FIA head-on crash test with flying colors, as well as other angle and glancing blow tests they conducted. However, those 'other' tests were not to any specific FIA standard because, quite frankly, none exist. CART or the FIA need to develop better test criteria for varying circumstances. They also claim the wall will work just fine on oval tracks and they have solved the transition between the straight and the turn with tapered barrier segments. Again, until funding can be provided to test this barrier on an oval, or until a track owner is willing to step up and install this barrier on their oval to see how it performs in real life crashes, we will withhold final judgment. However, we feel confident this barrier may be what the racing community has been waiting on for a very long time. Too long! We urge CART to take a serious look at this barrier. Either provide funding for further testing, develop their own test standards, or give their approval to install this barrier on tracks CART races on to see how well it performs. If it's good enough for the FIA to approve it for use on their F-1 tracks, we suspect it should be good enough for CART. The do-nothing alternative is unacceptable We owe it to the fans, the teams, the drivers, and most of all the spouses and children who endure the grief of a lost or seriously injured driver, to do something about the inherent danger of our existing wall systems. Go to our forums to discuss this article |
Our ranking out of 750 NASCAR websites since joining on 7/3/00 |
|
|
e-mail us: AutoRacing1 is an
independent internet online publication and is not affiliated with, sponsored by, or endorsed
by CART Inc., NASCAR, FIA, FedEx, Winston, or any other series sponsor. This material may not be published,
broadcast, or redistributed without permission. Copyright 1999 - 2000, AutoRacing1, Hamilton, NJ |
||
>