NASCAR announced Tuesday they have suspended
Chad Knaus, crew chief on Jimmie Johnson’s Daytona 500
winning team, for an additional three races for an illegal
modification found on the no. 48 Lowe’s Chevrolet following
qualifying on Feb. 12.
The team was not docked any points, and will
retain the points lead going into this Sunday’s race at Fontana,
Calif.
Hendrick Motorsports, owner of Johnson’s car,
said they would not appeal the penalty.
And why should they?
The penalty, while consistent with similar
punishments NASCAR has handed out in the past, is seen by many
as nothing more than a slap on the wrist.
On the other side of the coin, NASCAR also announced a penalty
against the Terry Labonte’s no. 96 team, which was caught using
an unapproved carburetor on their car during qualifying.
NASCAR took away 25 points from the no. 96 team and fined crew
chief Philippe Lopez $25,000, all for a technical infraction
they had no part in – Joe Gibbs Racing supplies the engines to
the team, and they were responsible for the illegal part.
Unfair? NASCAR doesn’t seem to think so. As far as the
sanctioning body is concerned, not having their crew chief
around is punishment enough for Johnson’s team.
Sure, not having Knaus at the track could have a negative
effect on the team psychologically, but as far as day-to-day
operations, it’ll be business as usual.
The penalty doesn’t prevent Knaus from going to the race shop
and prepping the cars for this weekend. The penalty doesn’t even
forbid him from going to California. He just can’t be at the
track.
But he doesn’t have to.
Computer telemetry, radio link-ups, real-time scoring – thanks
to the wonders of technology, Knaus doesn’t even need to be at
the racetrack, he can get it all while sitting on his sofa at
home.
Don’t believe it? Try it yourself – it’s available at NASCAR’s
official website. It’s called “Trackpass”, and with it, anyone
can be an armchair crew chief.
Considering the effort NASCAR puts forth to police cheating, the
punishment doesn’t fit the crime, especially considering the
fact this isn’t the first time Knaus has thumbed his nose at the
rule book.
Since becoming crew chief on the no. 48 car, Knaus has been
penalized by NASCAR six times and has been fined over $93,000.
Besides their Daytona 500 win, two of Johnson’s victories last
season were also clouded by controversy.
In March of last year, Knaus was fined $35,000 and suspended for
two races and the team was docked 25 points after their car was
found to be too low in post race inspection following Johnson’s
victory at Las Vegas Motor Speedway. Knaus’ suspension was
successfully appealed, but the fine and points penalty stood.
Then, last September at Dover, Johnson’s winning car was found
to have some modifications made to the shock absorbers.
Johnson’s win stood, and no penalty was assessed, but NASCAR
re-wrote the rules to prevent such tampering in the future.
While Knaus’ rap sheet is longer than most, there have been
several blatant examples of cheating that have been discovered
over the years as team get more inventive, turning the act of
cheating into almost an art form.
As the famous expression among NASCAR teams go – “It’s our job
to cheat – it’s their job to catch us.”
But NASCAR contends that the penalties they assess are supposed
to deter competitors from trying to cheat to gain an advantage.
Clearly, Knaus has not gotten the message.
And unless the penalties for cheating come with sharper teeth,
he never will.
Officials went over Johnson’s car with a fine-toothed comb
following the race – the car was found to be legit and therefore
so is the victory, but Johnson should never have been allowed to
race that car to begin with; NASCAR should have confiscated the
car as soon as the infraction was found and forced Johnson to
use his back-up car.
And a $25,000 fine? Chicken scratch for a team that just
pocketed well over $1 million for winning the Daytona 500.
Hendrick Motorsports probably spent more than that on food and
lodging for the team during Speedweeks.
NASCAR needs to penalize teams where is hurts – in the point
standings. $25,000 won’t amount to a hill of beans when it comes
down to the final race of the season.
But taking away points might.
And is 25 points really enough when it comes to blatant
cheating? 25 points might be OK if it’s a technical infraction
like Labonte’s – an unapproved part or a part that was
incorrectly manufactured.
But when a part is machined or built specifically to circumvent
the rules, perhaps a harsher punishment like 200 or even 500
points, virtually eliminating a team from championship
contention.
Maybe then, teams will listen.
Until then, it’s their job to cheat, and NASCAR’s job to catch
them, but when the penalty doesn’t fit the crime, who is really
going to be afraid of getting caught?
The author can be contacted
petem@autoracing1.com
Go to
our
forums
to discuss this article