for your iPhone
for your iPad
IndyCar

IndyCar Links

2014 Schedule

2014 IndyCar Rules

2014 Indy Lights Rules

2014 Pro Mazda Rules

2014 USF2000 Rules

2014 Drug Policy

2014 Teams

2013 Scanner Freq

Race Car Comparison

Lap Time Comparison

History CART/IRL Split


2014 Standings
After Long Beach
Pos. Driver Points

1 Will Power 93
2 Mike Conway 66
3 Simon Pagenaud 60
4 Helio Castroneves 55
5 Ryan Hunter-Reay 54
6 Scott Dixon 51
7 Carlos Munoz 48
8 Juan Pablo Montoya 47
9 Mikhail Aleshin 46
10 Sebastian Saavedra 42
11 Tony Kanaan 40
12 Justin Wilson 38
13 Takuma Sato 36
14 Josef Newgarden 34
15 Ryan Briscoe 33
16 Sebastien Bourdais 33
17 Graham Rahal 33
18 Marco Andretti 32
19 Carlos Huertas 32
20 Oriol Servia 26
21 Jack Hawksworth 24
22 James Hinchcliffe 20
23 Charlie Kimball 17

Wins
T1 Will Power 1
T1 Mike Conway 1

Podium Finishes
1 Will Power 2
T2 Ryan Hunter-Reay 1
T2 Helio Castroneves 1
T2 Mike Conway 1
T2 Carlos Munoz 1

Lap Leaders:
1 Will Power 74
2 Ryan Hunter-Reay 51
3 Takuma Sato 33
4 Scott Dixon 22
5 Mike Conway 4
6 Sebastian Saavedra 3
7 Helio Castroneves 2
8 Josef Newgarden 1


Prize Money
1 Will Power $50,000
T2 Mike Conway $30,000
T2 Ryan Hunter-Reay $30,000
4 Simon Pagenaud $18,000
5 Takuma Sato $17,000
T6 Helio Castroneves $15,000
T6 Carlos Munoz $15,000
T8 Juan Pablo Montoya $10,000
T8 Scott Dixon $10,000
T10 Mikhail Aleshin $8,000
T10 Tony Kanaan $8,000
12 Oriol Servia $7,000
T13 Justin Wilson $5,000
T13 Marco Andretti $5,000
T15 Sebastian Saavedra $4,000
T15 Josef Newgarden $4,000
T17 Ryan Briscoe $2,000
T17 Carlos Huertas $2,000

Entrant Points
Pos. # Entrant Points
1 12 Team Penske 93
2 20 Ed Carpenter Racing 66
3 77 Schmidt Peterson Motorsports 60
4 3 Team Penske 55
5 28 Andretti Autosport 54
6 9 Target Chip Ganassi Racing 51
7 34 Andretti Autosport HVM Racing 48
8 2 Team Penske 47
9 7 Schmidt Peterson Motorsports 46
10 17 KV AFS Racing 42
11 10 Target Chip Ganassi Racing 40
12 19 Dale Coyne Racing 38
13 14 A.J. Foyt Enterprises 36
14 67 Sarah Fisher Hartman Racing 34
15 8 NTT Data Chip Ganassi Racing 33
16 11 KVSH Racing 33
17 15 Rahal Letterman Lanigan Racing 33
18 25 Andretti Autosport 32
19 18 Dale Coyne Racing 32
20 16 Rahal Letterman Lanigan Racing 26
21 98 BHA/BBM with Curb-Agajanian 24
22 27 Andretti Autosport 20
23 83 Novo Nordisk Chip Ganassi Racing 17

Finishing Average
1 Will Power 1.5
2 Simon Pagenaud 5
T3 Helio Castroneves 7
T3 Oriol Servia 7
5 Scott Dixon 8
6 Mike Conway 8.5
7 Mikhail Aleshin 9
8 Juan Pablo Montoya 9.5
T9 Sebastian Saavedra 10
T9 Carlos Munoz 10
11 Ryan Hunter-Reay 11
T12 Tony Kanaan 12
T12 Justin Wilson 12
T14 Ryan Briscoe 13.5
T14 Sebastien Bourdais 13.5
T14 Graham Rahal 13.5
T17 Josef Newgarden 14
T17 Carlos Huertas 14
19 Takuma Sato 14.5
20 Marco Andretti 15
21 Jack Hawksworth 18
22 James Hinchcliffe 20
23 Charlie Kimball 21.5

Pole Positions
T1 Takuma Sato 1
T1 Ryan Hunter-Reay 1

Appearances in the Firestone Fast Six
1 Ryan Hunter-Reay 2
T2 Scott Dixon 1
T2 Tony Kanaan 1
T2 Sebastien Bourdais 1
T2 Will Power 1
T2 Takuma Sato 1
T2 Marco Andretti 1
T2 James Hinchcliffe 1
T2 Josef Newgarden 1
T2 Simon Pagenaud 1
T2 Jack Hawksworth 1

Qualifying Average
1 Ryan Hunter-Reay 2
2 Scott Dixon 6
3 Jack Hawksworth 6.5
4 Marco Andretti 7
5 Tony Kanaan 7.5
T6 Takuma Sato 8
T6 Sebastien Bourdais 8
T8 Will Power 9
T8 Carlos Munoz 9
10 Helio Castroneves 9.5
11 Simon Pagenaud 10
12 James Hinchcliffe 10.5
13 Oriol Servia 12
T14 Josef Newgarden 13
T14 Justin Wilson 13
16 Ryan Briscoe 13.5
17 Mike Conway 14.5
18 Sebastian Saavedra 16.5
19 Juan Pablo Montoya 17
20 Mikhail Aleshin 17.5
21 Carlos Huertas 19
22 Charlie Kimball 19.5
23 Graham Rahal 22
The Delta Wing - Tail heavy can be a good thing

Part 3 of 7
Tuesday, February 23, 2010

Advertisement

The Delta Wing car is tail heavy and should be tail happy
Part 3 of 7 in our Delta Wing series addresses the weight distribution, which defies typical race car design convention.

This one will be short but sweet, but we wanted to give it a dedicated article because it is so key in tying the other characteristics of the car together.

This car has over 70% of its weight on the rear wheels.

This also goes back to the big wheel comparison we made before. If you recall, the seat of a big wheel basically put the weight of the rider right over (or very close to) the rear axle. This was also briefly mentioned in discussing how the car turns. Essentially this car is all about the rear wheels and the front end is just there to point it in the direction you want to go.

Also with so much weight over the rear wheels, the transfer of weight under various loads is greatly reduced, namely under heavy braking.

To us, the biggest benefit to this is 1) Having a lot of weight over the wheels that drive the car thereby increasing traction under heavy acceleration and deceleration, and 2) being able to brake and steer deep into a corner, otherwise known as trail braking.

When a driver is braking into a corner in a current type of IndyCar, with the more uniform weight distribution, a significant amount of weight transfers to the front wheels, which end up doing most of the braking and the steering, while the rear just follows behind. This is why you typically do not see much trail-braking in IndyCars as it is very easy to lock up the front wheels and push wide, effectively nullifying a pass attempt.

It would be ideal for a driver to be able to have the option and ability to carry the brakes deeper into the corner, thereby increasing passing opportunities, especially on a road course. This is key to increasing the competitive on-track product, but also adds an additional driving element and skill requirement.

In the Delta Wing configuration, the rear is doing most of the braking, allowing the front to do the steering work.

We could talk about the friction circle and vector addition, but that might get too cryptic.

Let's look at it like this. Let's say there is a number that represents the  total amount of grip, and make that number 10. That grip can be all in one direction, forward or sideways, or a combination of the two that when added together, does not exceed 10. When you exceed 10, you lose grip and lock up a wheel. So let's say you want to brake as hard as possible, at 10, and then turn the wheel at maximum cornering speed, also 10. You add those two together and that is 20, which doesn't work.

Many of us have experienced this in the rain or snow when you go to hit the brakes and steer at the same time. The car just continues to go straight because you have used up all the grip in a straight line and there is none left to turn the car.

This is why almost all cars now have anti-lock brakes. It senses that limit of grip and comes off the brake for you just a bit, allowing you to steer the car and still brake at the highest possible level. Well, anti-lock brakes in a racing car are no fun, because it removes the skill of the driver.

So with this car, with the rear doing most of the braking work, we are not asking the front wheels to do two things, and the steering remains intact even at full braking.

With the majority of the weight on the rear wheels, the role of an active differential also becomes especially significant, and  that will be in one of our other articles in the series, so keep checking back for more!

Note from the simulations above how the driver is able to control the heavy tail around Long Beach, including the hairpin

Feedback can be sent to feedback@autoracing1.com

Go to our forums to discuss this article