for your iPhone
for your iPad
IndyCar

IndyCar Links

2017 Teams

2017 Schedule

2016 IC Rule Book

2015 IC Engine Rules

2015 IC Aero Rules

2014 Indy Lights Rules

2014 Pro Mazda Rules

2014 USF2000 Rules

2014 Drug Policy

2014 Scanner Freq

Race Car Comparison

Lap Time Comparison

History CART/IRL Split


2017 Point Standings
After Texas
Rank Driver Points

1 Scott Dixon 326
2 Simon Pagenaud 313
3 Takuma Sato 312
4 Helio Castroneves 305
5 Will Power 286
6 Graham Rahal 283
7 Josef Newgarden 277
8 Tony Kanaan 264
9 Alexander Rossi 254
10 James Hinchcliffe 232
11 Max Chilton 229
12 Ed Jones 228
13 Marco Andretti 210
14 Ryan Hunter-Reay 194
15 Mikhail Aleshin 192
16 JR Hildebrand 191
17 Carlos Munoz 180
18 Charlie Kimball 143
19 Conor Daly 140
20 Sebastien Bourdais 136
21 Ed Carpenter 124
22 Spencer Pigot 124
23 Juan Pablo Montoya 93
25 Gabby Chaves 83
26 Oriol Servia 61
27 Fernando Alonso 47
28 Sebastian Saavedra 33
30 Pippa Mann 32
31 Esteban Gutierrez 27
32 Jay Howard 24
33 Zach Veach 23
34 Sage Karam 23
37 James Davison 21
38 Jack Harvey 17
39 Tristan Vautier 15
42 Buddy Lazier 14

Rookie of Year Standings
1. Ed Jones 228
2. Fernando Alonso 47
3. Zach Veach 23
4. Jack Harvey 17
5. Esteban Gutierrez 11
The Delta Wing - NOT Rear-Steering

Article 5 of 7 by Scott Morris
Tuesday, March 9, 2010

Advertisement

Delta Wing Differential
Before delving into this installment, we do want to say that we are/not formally endorsing the concept at this time, but do feel that the design has been misconstrued by many. We will address a number of these issues in our summary article, but this installment does deal with one misconception: the car is rear-steer.

This was fairly easy to mistake, as it has been mentioned several times that the design of this car incorporates what is known as an "active" differential (rear end)

This is a design that allows the torque to be directed to the wheel of choice, by setup, active computer control, or even control directly by the driver.

Why would this be necessary, or even an advantage? Well, there are a few reasons, but one of them is not traction control.

One of the biggest challenges in a racing car, especially as it applies to oval racing, is that the outside tires on an oval setup will be as much as 1/2 inch larger diameter (taller) as those mounted on the inside wheels relative to the track. This is known as "stagger."

If you ever placed a cone cup on a table and tried to roll it, of course it would not roll straight. It turns toward the pointy side. With the smaller tires on the inside, the car turns more naturally to that direction, which here in the USA would of course be to the left.

The geometric condition is that the outside wheel is travelling a further distance than the inside wheel, so it must be sped up just a bit to keep the rear stable and consistent in handling. If any of you have ever raced karts, you know that you have to drive the kart hard enough to get that inside rear wheel off the ground just a little bit to get the kart to handle well. That is not really a good solution in an IndyCar however.

Input torque is applied to the ring gear (blue), which turns the entire carrier (blue), providing torque to both side gears (red and yellow), which in turn may drive the left and right wheels. If the resistance at both wheels is equal, the planet gear (green) does not rotate, and both wheels turn at the same rate.
Having a tire on one side that is a little larger than the other sounds fairly simple, but is not quite so. Tires are pliable deformable objects that are very susceptible to many external factors such as humidity, temperature and even light that can slightly change the dimensions of the tire. We have all heard of a team at one point or another talk about getting a bad set of tires.

The manufacturers and teams do their best to find tires that match and keep them together as set. This can be a very tricky and time consuming ordeal, and introduces a higher cost and element of possible error.

Normally, IndyCars have, for all practical purposes a limited slip differential. They use this for the road courses, and then add something called a "spool" for the ovals, that essentially causes the two half shafts to turn at the same speed.

All of these factors create an additional cost. Also, there really is very little relevance to road-going cars, giving manufacturers one less reason to be in the sport. The sport needs to be relevant to what they produce and sell. After all, that is where the sport came from.

All road cars by 2012 are required to have an active differential that provides stability control for the driver. Currently, most cars use a system that applies the brakes to one wheel or the other, instead of incorporating an active differential.

Incorporating such a system in a racing car just incorporates one more element that keeps manufacturers interested in racing as a development platform.

If the left side gear (red) encounters resistance, the planet gear (green) rotates about the left side gear, in turn applying extra rotation to the right side gear (yellow).
An active differential can be adjusted such that the outside wheel rotates at a different rate, without the need for fitting specially sized tires. It can be adjusted on-track as well, so the driver can adjust "stagger" through a given run.

We are told that when Andretti heard about this feature, he said "That's a big deal...that is huge."

The other interesting aspect of this is effectively the same effect, but a slightly different application. Since you can adjust the torque from one wheel to the other, you could effectively steer the car much in the same way a boat captain steers a boat with the throttles, or a airliner can be steered with just the engines, by varying power from one to the other.

Imagine how this could be applied by the driver on any track to get the car to turn better. This would even work on a road course.

Applying this measure to tune the car is also going to be much easier on the tires as well. Making various adjustments to camber, toe and caster can have adverse effects on tire wear. Sometimes, you just accept this as a cost of achieving a desirable setup.

With this system, the driver could actually tune the setup of the car on-track. It is a case where the technology doesn’t take anything away from the driving task, and in fact adds a new facet to the required skill set.

The active differential is just another way the Delta Wing represents a revolutionary change in racing technology. The ironic thing is, for a car that is so revolutionary and seemingly radical, it has much more design relevance to a road car than any other purpose built racing car.

Feedback can be sent to feedback@autoracing1.com

Go to our forums to discuss this article