for your iPhone
for your iPad
Formula 1
F1

F1 Links

2016 Schedule

Race Car Comparison

Lap Time Comparison

Champ Car vs F1 Car

Teams & Driver Page


2016 Point Standings

After England
Championship Standings:
Drivers
Pos Driver Points
1 Nico Rosberg 168
2 Lewis Hamilton 167
3 Kimi Raikkonen 106
4 Daniel Ricciardo 100
5 Sebastian Vettel 98
6 Max Verstappen 90
7 Valtteri Bottas 54
8 Sergio Perez 47
9 Felipe Massa 38
10 Romain Grosjean 28
11 Nico Hulkenberg 26
12 Carlos Sainz 26
13 Daniil Kvyat 23
14 Fernando Alonso 18
15 Jenson Button 13
16 Kevin Magnussen 6
17 Stoffel Vandoorne 1
18 Pascal Wehrlein 1
19 Marcus Ericsson 0
20 Jolyon Palmer 0
21 Felipe Nasr 0
22 Rio Haryanto 0
23 Esteban Guitierrez 0

Constructors
1 Mercedes 335
2 Ferrari 204
3 Red Bull Racing Tag Heuer 198
4 Williams Mercedes 92
5 Force India Mercedes 73
6 Toro Rosso Ferrari 41
7 McLaren Honda 32
8 Haas Ferrari 28
9 Renault 6
10 MRT Mercedes 1
11 Sauber Ferrari 0
 

An Angry David Hunt Speaks Out About Team Lotus

Team Lotus civil war breaks out with Tony Fernandes and David Hunt
Sunday, March 20, 2011

Advertisement

David Hunt
It would be nice, just prior to seasons’ start, to think that the Team Lotus vs. Group Lotus dispute had finally been resolved – but such is not the case. The F1 team and the major Renault F1 sponsor are meeting head-on in the UK’s High Court this week, squabbling over branding rights and other related issues that should never have been mistreated by either party – given their backgrounds – in the first place.

It is also clear that another major player in the saga – David Hunt – is both annoyed and frustrated by the situation. Hunt, the younger brother of James, and a pure racer at heart, bought Team Lotus from the Administrators in 1994. Since then, he has worked hard to bring the Team Lotus brand back into F1. Hunt has an excellent record for sponsorship procurement – most of the companies on the TL cars in the early 1990s were from his portfolio – and over the past decade, despite changing times – has never lost site of the importance of the Team Lotus brand in F1.

“When we had to make the loyal Team Lotus staff redundant in 1995,” said Hunt over the weekend, “I made a promise to them, and the fans, to return it to F1 in the hands of a worthy custodian. Initially, I had high hopes that Tony (Fernandes), and Din and Nasa (Fernandes' partners), were going to tick the boxes. However, it now seems that they are not as committed to the future of Team Lotus as they represented to me they would be.”

It is not believed that the imminent High Court battle will result in the collapse of either side – or total victory for either side – but the implication from Hunt is that the future of the Team Lotus brand is by no means secure.

“I am still 100% loyal to the Team Lotus brand and fans and long to do my best for them so Tony, Din and Nasa have the maximum chance of success in this trial. However, why should I continue to help them after the way I’ve been treated? They need my help right now as I can see some potentially serious holes in their case but they seem to be treating me as the enemy, rather than Group Lotus, and have this week even instructed their lawyers to sue me for defamation! I have no idea of what their grounds are for this.

“With the trial due to start next week, I’m still keen to help and their lawyers have stated that they’re keen for me to do so. They’ve been sending me plenty of materials which I’ve been through and I’m now in a position to give significant assistance. The knowledge that I’ve acquired over the 16 years puts me in a unique position to be able to guide the Team Lotus legal team on many issues, cross examination etc. Mr. Justice Peter Smith, the judge presiding over the summary judgment hearing, recognized this and seemed to suggest that I was probably best placed to shed some helpful light on matters for the court.

“What angers me is that I have, in good faith, worked extremely hard on the build up to the hearing because I believed Tony would honor our January agreement. My work has been praised by their lawyers. Despite that, Tony has found excuse after excuse and caused delay after delay in honoring their side of our agreement. He’s apparently ‘changed his mind’ at the 11th hour, by his own admission, now that I’ve done so much work on his company’s behalf, and he’s trying to renegotiate by offering new terms which are, frankly, ludicrous.

“All I’m looking for is for Tony to stick to his word and honor our agreement. If he doesn’t, then regrettably I don’t see why I should continue to provide assistance and this trial won’t be the last battle he’s facing, even if he wins.”

As I’ve said before, it wasn’t complicated. If you had a serious inclination to bring the Team Lotus name back to F1 – and a proper knowledge of the sport, and you’d done your homework – your plan of action should have been simple: first, deal with David Hunt, owner of Team Lotus. Second, put together the money and the team. Third, secure an entry. Fourth, go racing.

Astonishingly, both Tony Fernandes and Group Lotus completely avoided Step One when they first decided to look at F1. David Hunt is an open book; is now something of a legal expert, particularly on all matters related to Team Lotus; and is the sort of man you would trust with your life: why did both parties ignore him? Their actions are inexplicable. Fernandes appeared to realize his error last September, and messily tried to incorporate it into his project long after he’d gone racing – but it wasn’t enough to prevent either this week’s sordid High Court case with Group Lotus (a case that would not be happening if everything had been executed correctly, with Hunt, in the first place) or what would appear to be further issues with Hunt.

Feedback can be sent to feedback@autoracing1.com

Go to our forums to discuss this article