for your iPhone
for your iPad
IndyCar

IndyCar Links

2015 Schedule

2015 IC Rule Book

2015 IC Engine Rules

2015 IC Aero Rules

2014 Indy Lights Rules

2014 Pro Mazda Rules

2014 USF2000 Rules

2014 Drug Policy

2015 Teams

2014 Scanner Freq

Race Car Comparison

Lap Time Comparison

History CART/IRL Split


2015 Standings
After Milwaukee
Rank Driver Points

1 Juan Montoya 439
2 Scott Dixon 385
3 Helio Castroneves 370
- Graham Rahal 370
5 Will Power 369
6 Sebastien Bourdais 343
7 Marco Andretti 332
8 Tony Kanaan 314
9 Josef Newgarden 309
10 Simon Pagenaud 278
11 Charlie Kimball 266
12 Carlos Munoz 251
13 Takuma Sato 229
14 Ryan Hunter-Reay 227
15 James Jakes 197
- Gabby Chaves 197
17 Jack Hawksworth 184
18 Luca Filippi 161
19 Stefano Coletti 150
20 Sage Karam 137
21 James Hinchcliffe 129
22 Tristan Vautier 105
23 Ryan Briscoe 84
24 Conor Daly 81
25 Simona De Silvestro 66
26 Sebastian Saavedra 61
27 JR Hildebrand 57
28 Pippa Mann 52
29 Ed Carpenter 47
30 Rodolfo Gonzalez 40
31 Justin Wilson 38
- Francesco Dracone 38
33 Townsend Bell 32
34 Carlos Huertas 31
35 Alex Tagliani 27
36 Bryan Clauson 10
- Oriol Servia 10
- James Davison 10.

Manufacturers
Chevy 1,213
Honda 959
It's 2011 already.  We need to start thinking that way.

by Brian Mackey
Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Advertisement

Much has been debated in recent seasons regarding Indy Car’s television broadcast coverage. Much of it negative. Numerous stories and comments have appeared that continue to describe Indy Car’s Versus cable network coverage as inadequate and doomed to ultimate failure, the television coverage itself, if not the entire series. The reasoning goes that without credible rating numbers, the sport cannot attract sufficient sponsorship funding to be a viable commercial venture. All of that is true. But it’s also wrong.

It’s so very “20th century” to believe that relatively passive television broadcasting of an event is sufficient to satisfy today’s marketing objectives. Simply broadcasting to a larger audience is not going to cure Indy Cars marketing challenges. More modern thinking will.

As an illustration of how to develop a modern motorsport marketing platform, from a marketing perspective, I would point to Ken Block. Who? Ken Block, the (now) rally driver. I think all might agree that his motorsport campaign receives, at best, modest traditional television coverage. He receives network coverage through the X-games, but that seems about all. He has been the subject of several feature oriented stories, but little commercial network, not much cable and certainly not much in the way of ratings to utilize as the basis for his marketing of the rally team. If he were to primarily rely on television rating numbers, his rally car would be painted vanilla white, with not a sponsor to be found – like many of his rally predecessors. In fact, I tried to sell some “rally” oriented sponsorship 15 -20 years ago, with no results. From the traditional standpoint, rallying is a virtual “impossible” to sell to sponsors, particularly back then.

Yet, traditional he is not. What he has accomplished should be a lesson to every race team, including Indy Car teams, looking for the combination that will bring positive marketing results to their sponsor partner campaign. Consider his numbers that are relevant, viable and most importantly, marketing potent. As of this writing:

• His Facebook friends number 1,472,643. Danica, Indy Cars biggest star, has 25,357. Helio has 7,110. The Indy Car series itself numbers 39,365. Danica’s, Helio’s and Indy Car’s combined friends equal about 5% of Block’s.

• Ken Block’s YouTube videos totally destroy any comparison to Indy Car. His top three viral videos on YouTube number 30,500,229, 25,058,188 and 22,855,603 views. By comparison, Danica Patrick scores highest as might be expected with 2,602,479 for her SI swimsuit video and 1,689,547 views on her Godaddy.com commercial.

o Block’s Gymkhana 2 video was 2009's #4 most viewed viral video.

o Block’s Gymkhana 3 video got more than seven million views in its first week.

• If you Google “Ken Block” you get 11,400,000 returns. Compare that to “Danica Patrick” 5,300,000, Helio Castroneves 540,000 or “Indy” and you get 145,000.

So, picture yourself a marketing man. You’re being pitched on sponsorship of a certain property, be it an Indy car team (as an example) or Ken Block (hypothetically). Ken has a rally program that features limited “traditional” media compared to Indy Car’s television coverage, albeit on Versus, but it is national television cable coverage. But Block is not selling television coverage, or at least not relying on it.

TV is merely a piece of a larger pie and a by-product of a multi-layered media campaign. What he has developed and is developing is a relevant, smart, interactive, modern and exciting platform of motorsport to offer sponsors. He utilizes today’s “media” choices extremely well and has extended his influence far beyond what might be reached via television coverage alone. His videos are creative, visual and entertaining. The response to them has been, in a word, sensational. His viral videos are among the top viewed on the internet, period.

Now, you’re that marketing guy at a sponsor desk and you’ve just been presented with these kinds of numbers, this kind of interactive relationship, this level of commercial platform viability and you have to choose. Block or the Indy Car team……

Ken Block’s approach is basically available to all of motorsports with the proper and creative application of a modern outlook on motorsport marketing. It’s not easy, mind you. Block’s challenge now is to keep it fresh and relevant. It’s extremely difficult to be that creative and stay that creative, but in fundamental terms, we all can duplicate what Ken has done. I believe that Versus is not the problem. In fact, their coverage of Indy Car racing is quite commendable. Maybe it could be better, but that is not the debate here. 20th century thinking is.

I would advise all of us in motorsport to seriously consider the strategies employed by motorsport campaigns such as Ken Block’s. Many kudos to him and his marketing team for creating this level of sponsor success. If motorsports were to adopt as much of his strategy as possible, the television debate would be cured as well. Ratings would surge as the popularity of the sport soared among FANS, not passive television viewers.

Ultimately, the proof of the pudding is in the eating. Take a quick look at Block’s rally car. It’s covered with sponsors. I hope and trust he can keep it going with fresh and quality creative. In the meantime, I suggest we all follow his lead and re-think the process of attracting sponsors. It’s 2011 and there is so much that can be done.

Brian Mackey,
Mackey Marketing Group, Inc.
the flat out marketing agency

Feedback can be sent to feedback@autoracing1.com

Go to our forums to discuss this article