for your iPhone
for your iPad

IndyCar Links

2014 Schedule

2014 IndyCar Rules

2014 Indy Lights Rules

2014 Pro Mazda Rules

2014 USF2000 Rules

2014 Drug Policy

2014 Teams

2014 Scanner Freq

Race Car Comparison

Lap Time Comparison

History CART/IRL Split

2014 Standings
After Pocono
Driver Standings

1 Will Power 446
2 Helio Castroneves 446
3 Simon Pagenaud 402
4 Juan Pablo Montoya 391
5 Ryan Hunter-Reay 388
6 Carlos Munoz (R) 340
7 Marco Andretti 325
8 Scott Dixon 297
9 Ryan Briscoe 285
10 Sebastien Bourdais 271
11 Tony Kanaan 267
12 James Hinchcliffe 266
13 Mikhail Aleshin 263
14 Justin Wilson 253
15 Charlie Kimball 239
16 Jack Hawksworth 227
17 Carlos Huertas (R) 224
18 Josef Newgarden 220
19 Graham Rahal 202
20 Sebastian Saavedra 196
21 Takuma Sato 189
22 Mike Conway 152
23 Ed Carpenter 138
24 Oriol Servia 88
25 Kurt Busch (R) 80
26 JR Hildebrand 66
27 Sage Karam (R) 57
28 James Davison (R) 34
29 Jacques Villeneuve 29
30 Alex Tagliani 28
31 Luca Filippi 24
32 Townsend Bell 22
33 Pippa Mann 21
34 Martin Plowman (R) 18
35 Buddy Lazier 11
36 Franck Montagny 8

Rookie of the Year
1 Carlos Munoz 340
2 Mikhail Aleshin 263
3 Jack Hawksworth 217
4 Carlos Huertas 204
5 Kurt Busch 80
6 Sage Karam 57
7 James Davison 34
8 Martin Plowman 18

T1 Ryan Hunter-Reay 2
T1 Will Power 2
T1 Simon Pagenaud 2
T4 Mike Conway 1
T4 Helio Castroneves 1
T4 Carlos Huertas 1
T4 Ed Carpenter 1
T4 Juan Pablo Montoya 1

Podium Finishes
T1 Will Power 5
T1 Helio Castroneves 5
2 Ryan Hunter-Reay 4
T3 Carlos Munoz 3
T3 Juan Pablo Montoya 3
T6 Marco Andretti 2
T6 Simon Pagenaud 2
T8 Mike Conway 1
T8 Carlos Huertas 1
T8 Scott Dixon 1
T8 Tony Kanaan 1
T8 Graham Rahal 1
T8 Charlie Kimball 1
T8 Ed Carpenter 1
T8 Jack Hawksworth 1
T8 Mikhail Aleshin 1

Lap Leaders:
1 Will Power 348
2 Helio Castroneves 174
3 Ryan Hunter-Reay 165
4 Ed Carpenter 116
5 Tony Kanaan 79
6 Juan Pablo Montoya 74
7 Takuma Sato 67
8 James Hinchcliffe 56
9 Simon Pagenaud 53
10 Jack Hawksworth 32
11 Scott Dixon 27
12 Marco Andretti 22
13 Justin Wilson 20
14 Sebastian Saavedra 14
15 Graham Rahal 10
16 Mike Conway 8
17 Josef Newgarden 8
T18 Oriol Servia 7
T18 Carlos Huertas 7
19 Ryan Briscoe 5
20 Mikhail Aleshin 4
21 Alex Tagliani 3
22 Sebastien Bourdais 2

Entrant Points
Pos. # Entrant Points
1 12 Team Penske 446
2 3 Team Penske 446
3 77 Schmidt Peterson Hamilton Motorsports 402
4 2 Team Penske 391
5 28 Andretti Autosport 388
6 34 Andretti Autosport/HVM 340
7 25 Andretti Autosport 325
8 9 Target Chip Ganassi Racing 297
9 20 Ed Carpenter Racing 290
10 8 NTT Data Chip Ganassi Racing 285
11 11 KVSH Racing 271
12 10 Target Chip Ganassi Racing 267
13 27 Andretti Autosport 266
14 7 SMP Racing 263
15 19 Dale Coyne Racing 253
16 83 Novo Nordisk Chip Ganassi Racing 239
17 98 BHA/BBM with Curb-Agajanian 227
18 18 Dale Coyne Racing 224
19 67 Sarah Fisher Hartman Racing 220
20 15 Rahal Letterman Lanigan Racing 202
21 17 KV/AFS Racing 196
22 14 A.J. Foyt Racing 189
23 16 Rahal Letterman Lanigan Racing 112
24 26 Andretti Autosport 88
25 21 Ed Carpenter Racing 66
26 22 Dreyer and Reinbold 57
27 33 KV Racing Technology 34
28 5 Schmidt Peterson Motorsports 29
29 68 Sarah Fisher Hartman Racing 28
30 6 KV Racing Technology 22
31 63 Dale Coyne Racing 21
32 41 A.J. Foyt Racing 18
33 91 Lazier Partners Racing 11

Finishing Average
1 Helio Castroneves 5.81
2 Kurt Busch 6.00
3 Will Power 6.09
4 Simon Pagenaud 6.72
5 Sage Karam 9.00
6 J.R. Hildebrand 10.00
T7 Scott Dixon 10.18
T7 Carlos Munoz 10.18
9 Juan Pablo Montoya 10.45
10 Ryan Hunter-Reay 10.72
11 Ryan Briscoe 11.75
12 Marco Andretti 12.125
13 Carlos Munoz 12.375
T14 Oriol Servia 12.5
T14 Justin Wilson 12.5
16 Alex Tagliani 13.0
17 Sebastien Bourdais 13.25
18 Charlie Kimball 13.625
19 Mike Conway 13.66
T20 Jacques Villeneuve 14.0
T20 Ed Carpenter 14.0
22 Carlos Huertas 14.25
23 Mikhail Aleshin 14.875
24 James Hinchcliffe 15.125
T25 Takuma Sato 15.5
T25 Jack Hawksworth 15.5
27 Sebastian Saavedra 15.75
28 James Davison 16.00
29 Josef Newgarden 16.375
30 Graham Rahal 16.625
31 Martin Plowman 20.5
32 Franck Montagny 22.0
33 Pippa Mann 24.0
34 Townsend Bell 25.0
35 Buddy Lazier 32.0

Pole Positions
T1 Takuma Sato 2
T1 Will Power 2
T1 Helio Castroneves 2
T4 Ryan Hunter-Reay 1
T4 Sebastian Saavedra 1
T4 Ed Carpenter 1
T4 Simon Pagenaud 1
T4 Juan Pablo Montoya 1

Appearances in the Firestone Fast Six
1 Ryan Hunter-Reay 4
T2 Scott Dixon 3
T2 Will Power 3
T2 James Hinchcliffe 3
T2 Helio Castroneves 3
T2 Jack Hawksworth 3
T7 Simon Pagenaud 2
T7 Josef Newgarden 2
T9 Takuma Sato 1
T9 Marco Andretti 1
T9 Sebastien Bourdais 1
T9 Tony Kanaan 1
T9 Sebastian Saavedra 1
T9 Mike Conway 1
T9 Juan Pablo Montoya 1
T9 Ryan Briscoe 1
Will abandoning oval racing really hurt IndyCar?

by Mark J. Cipolloni
Sunday, December 11, 2011


Horrific crashes, such as this one in 2001 at Atlanta Motor Speedway were not uncommon in  the IRL/IndyCar.  Note cars flying through the air.
This article argues, and rightly so, that IndyCar is wrong to blame the Las Vegas Motor Speedway for Dan Wheldon's death.  It could have happened at any 'pack' racing oval track facility.  In fact we have seen many accidents in the IRL over the years that were just as horrific as what happened in Las Vegas. 

The problem is not so much the track as it is the 'pack' racing mentality that IndyCar had.  We said for years they were going to kill someone and we just hoped they did not launch a car into the grandstands and kill 50 fans in one fell swoop.

The IRL/IndyCar has maimed and killed umpteen drivers over the years as we spelled out in this Oval Track injury report since the IRL was formed.

It was not until Wheldon's untimely death that everyone involved agreed they must put an end to the nonsense.  Drivers, especially ones as popular as Dan Wheldon, could not be 'sacrificial lambs' to satisfy the warped desire to go NASCAR one better and have Daytona and Talladega 'pack racing' photo finishes at any high banked oval.  It was a major part of IndyCar's marketing plan and they put out many press releases hyperbolizing the close finishes, and insinuating that IndyCar racing was better than NASCAR for that reason. zzzz

The article goes on to argue that CART/Champ Car died because it focused on road and street circuit racing, which of course sent the staff at ballistic. We have had enough of the lies.

With all due respect to Terry Blount of ESPN who wrote the article (he does make some valid points), IndyCar isn't going back to the Vegas oval because despite giving away 100,000 free tickets you could shoot a cannon into the grandstands and not hit anyone.  They used safety as an excuse.

When in doubt, follow the money.  The race was a financial bloodbath. If the grandstands were packed you could bet IndyCar would be back.  They would find a way to break up the 'pack' racing.

The grandson and his "I am Indy" hat.  He was Indy alright.  Only Anton George would promote a race series with hats and shirts saying "I am Indy" the most ridiculous slogan in the history of sports.  The grandson is to blame for IndyCar's downward spiral into oblivion, not CART, not Champ Car and certainly not road and street circuits.
And the only reason, and I do mean the only reason, CART/Champ Car died is because Anton George took their biggest race away (Indy 500) and then used voodoo economics (family millions) to spend Champ Car into the ground.  He blew through 1/2 billion dollars to kill off CART/Champ Car, while CART/Champ Car was trying to run their series like a proper business.

In 1995 when the IRL was formed, CART was bigger than NASCAR, twice the sponsorship in the paddock and doing just fine with those road and street courses thank you.  Then the grandson came along and destroyed it all.  And look what we have today.

It was a pyrrhic victory - a war that when it's all over no one is left standing.  For all intents and purposes that is where IndyCar is today - barely alive as measured by TV ratings and attendance (except for the Indy 500).

We are sick and tired of reading stories by uninformed journalists saying that IndyCar would surely die if it followed CART's model. 

Excuse me?  CART run IndyCar racing was the most successful in the history of IndyCar racing.  The grandstands were full, sponsorship was huge and the TV ratings were good.

It was so successful in fact that Bernie Ecclestone would badmouth it every chance he got because he was darn worried that it was approaching F1 in worldwide popularity.

It was the grandson, Anton George, and his voodoo economics that destroyed CART/Champ Car.

It's high time these oval-centric journalists (you know who you are) take their rose colored glasses off and write the real story.  NASCAR owns oval racing in the USA.  Fans don't give a hoot about watching IndyCars on ovals save for the Indy 500, which is 'tradition.'  If they cared the TV ratings would be high and the grandstands packed.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

I am not saying that IndyCar should give up on the Indy 500, certainly that race has tradition and it will always be the single most important part of IndyCar racing.  And I am not saying IndyCar should give up on oval racing altogether.  Where it makes sense (Iowa for example) IndyCar should race there.

But to artificially add oval tracks to the schedule that will be financial bloodbaths and make IndyCar look like a loser (can't hide the crowd on oval tracks) because "we must have a good number of oval track races on the schedule or we will surely die" is just the wrong attitude and it's time IndyCar stop living the lie.

IndyCar is in the entertainment business, and like any properly run business, it's product should cater to the customer's desire and where the customer will buy your product.

Look at the Baltimore Grand Prix. A race the customer loved - the grandstands were full, the grounds were packed and everyone was smiling.

Sure the race lost money the first year, every street race does because of the high start-up costs.  A cash flow diagram showing when you will go 'cash positive' is part of any proper business plan. Every business starts out losing money.  That's why banks or Venture Capitalists invest in startup businesses, to get them going and hold them over until the business generates enough revenue and income to overcome the early losses.

But building an oval track has even higher start-up costs.  How are they overcome?  ISC and SMI are public companies who used shareholder money to justify building the facilities and their huge upfront costs.  In some cases, years ago, they were built by a rich family or businessman.

Will abandoning oval racing and becoming a road racing focused series really hurt IndyCar? 

Absolutely not. 

The product must cater to the customer's desires, no matter what the type of track they race on.  The days of voodoo economics in IndyCar racing must end, and that's what Randy Bernard is trying to do and hence why he dumped the Vegas oval, dumped the Loudon oval, dumped the Milwaukee oval and is balking at re-signed the Texas Motor Speedway oval deal where SMI does not want to pay as much money as IndyCar wants because attendance has been dwindling.

Racing has always been dangerous.  That's just part of the sport.  And it has always been dangerous at Texas Motor Speedway as well, but they still raced there.  Don't think so, then check out Kenny Brack's 2003 crash there on YouTube. Check out Davey Hamilton's in 2001.  Brack suffered a broken sternum and femur, two crushed ankles and shattered a vertebra in his spine. Doctors wanted to amputate Hamilton's pulverized feet and lower legs.

It's time to stop the lies and using danger as the reason IndyCar is abandoning a lot of the ovals.

It's time to run the sport like a proper business, and Randy Bernard is trying to do that.

When in doubt, just do what's right.

Feedback can be sent to

Go to our forums to discuss this article