for your iPhone
for your iPad

IndyCar Links

2014 Schedule

2014 IndyCar Rules

2014 Indy Lights Rules

2014 Pro Mazda Rules

2014 USF2000 Rules

2014 Drug Policy

2014 Teams

2014 Scanner Freq

Race Car Comparison

Lap Time Comparison

History CART/IRL Split

2014 Standings
After Pocono
Driver Standings

1 Will Power 446
2 Helio Castroneves 446
3 Simon Pagenaud 402
4 Juan Pablo Montoya 391
5 Ryan Hunter-Reay 388
6 Carlos Munoz (R) 340
7 Marco Andretti 325
8 Scott Dixon 297
9 Ryan Briscoe 285
10 Sebastien Bourdais 271
11 Tony Kanaan 267
12 James Hinchcliffe 266
13 Mikhail Aleshin 263
14 Justin Wilson 253
15 Charlie Kimball 239
16 Jack Hawksworth 227
17 Carlos Huertas (R) 224
18 Josef Newgarden 220
19 Graham Rahal 202
20 Sebastian Saavedra 196
21 Takuma Sato 189
22 Mike Conway 152
23 Ed Carpenter 138
24 Oriol Servia 88
25 Kurt Busch (R) 80
26 JR Hildebrand 66
27 Sage Karam (R) 57
28 James Davison (R) 34
29 Jacques Villeneuve 29
30 Alex Tagliani 28
31 Luca Filippi 24
32 Townsend Bell 22
33 Pippa Mann 21
34 Martin Plowman (R) 18
35 Buddy Lazier 11
36 Franck Montagny 8

Rookie of the Year
1 Carlos Munoz 340
2 Mikhail Aleshin 263
3 Jack Hawksworth 217
4 Carlos Huertas 204
5 Kurt Busch 80
6 Sage Karam 57
7 James Davison 34
8 Martin Plowman 18

T1 Ryan Hunter-Reay 2
T1 Will Power 2
T1 Simon Pagenaud 2
T4 Mike Conway 1
T4 Helio Castroneves 1
T4 Carlos Huertas 1
T4 Ed Carpenter 1
T4 Juan Pablo Montoya 1

Podium Finishes
T1 Will Power 5
T1 Helio Castroneves 5
2 Ryan Hunter-Reay 4
T3 Carlos Munoz 3
T3 Juan Pablo Montoya 3
T6 Marco Andretti 2
T6 Simon Pagenaud 2
T8 Mike Conway 1
T8 Carlos Huertas 1
T8 Scott Dixon 1
T8 Tony Kanaan 1
T8 Graham Rahal 1
T8 Charlie Kimball 1
T8 Ed Carpenter 1
T8 Jack Hawksworth 1
T8 Mikhail Aleshin 1

Lap Leaders:
1 Will Power 348
2 Helio Castroneves 174
3 Ryan Hunter-Reay 165
4 Ed Carpenter 116
5 Tony Kanaan 79
6 Juan Pablo Montoya 74
7 Takuma Sato 67
8 James Hinchcliffe 56
9 Simon Pagenaud 53
10 Jack Hawksworth 32
11 Scott Dixon 27
12 Marco Andretti 22
13 Justin Wilson 20
14 Sebastian Saavedra 14
15 Graham Rahal 10
16 Mike Conway 8
17 Josef Newgarden 8
T18 Oriol Servia 7
T18 Carlos Huertas 7
19 Ryan Briscoe 5
20 Mikhail Aleshin 4
21 Alex Tagliani 3
22 Sebastien Bourdais 2

Entrant Points
Pos. # Entrant Points
1 12 Team Penske 446
2 3 Team Penske 446
3 77 Schmidt Peterson Hamilton Motorsports 402
4 2 Team Penske 391
5 28 Andretti Autosport 388
6 34 Andretti Autosport/HVM 340
7 25 Andretti Autosport 325
8 9 Target Chip Ganassi Racing 297
9 20 Ed Carpenter Racing 290
10 8 NTT Data Chip Ganassi Racing 285
11 11 KVSH Racing 271
12 10 Target Chip Ganassi Racing 267
13 27 Andretti Autosport 266
14 7 SMP Racing 263
15 19 Dale Coyne Racing 253
16 83 Novo Nordisk Chip Ganassi Racing 239
17 98 BHA/BBM with Curb-Agajanian 227
18 18 Dale Coyne Racing 224
19 67 Sarah Fisher Hartman Racing 220
20 15 Rahal Letterman Lanigan Racing 202
21 17 KV/AFS Racing 196
22 14 A.J. Foyt Racing 189
23 16 Rahal Letterman Lanigan Racing 112
24 26 Andretti Autosport 88
25 21 Ed Carpenter Racing 66
26 22 Dreyer and Reinbold 57
27 33 KV Racing Technology 34
28 5 Schmidt Peterson Motorsports 29
29 68 Sarah Fisher Hartman Racing 28
30 6 KV Racing Technology 22
31 63 Dale Coyne Racing 21
32 41 A.J. Foyt Racing 18
33 91 Lazier Partners Racing 11

Finishing Average
1 Helio Castroneves 5.81
2 Kurt Busch 6.00
3 Will Power 6.09
4 Simon Pagenaud 6.72
5 Sage Karam 9.00
6 J.R. Hildebrand 10.00
T7 Scott Dixon 10.18
T7 Carlos Munoz 10.18
9 Juan Pablo Montoya 10.45
10 Ryan Hunter-Reay 10.72
11 Ryan Briscoe 11.75
12 Marco Andretti 12.125
13 Carlos Munoz 12.375
T14 Oriol Servia 12.5
T14 Justin Wilson 12.5
16 Alex Tagliani 13.0
17 Sebastien Bourdais 13.25
18 Charlie Kimball 13.625
19 Mike Conway 13.66
T20 Jacques Villeneuve 14.0
T20 Ed Carpenter 14.0
22 Carlos Huertas 14.25
23 Mikhail Aleshin 14.875
24 James Hinchcliffe 15.125
T25 Takuma Sato 15.5
T25 Jack Hawksworth 15.5
27 Sebastian Saavedra 15.75
28 James Davison 16.00
29 Josef Newgarden 16.375
30 Graham Rahal 16.625
31 Martin Plowman 20.5
32 Franck Montagny 22.0
33 Pippa Mann 24.0
34 Townsend Bell 25.0
35 Buddy Lazier 32.0

Pole Positions
T1 Takuma Sato 2
T1 Will Power 2
T1 Helio Castroneves 2
T4 Ryan Hunter-Reay 1
T4 Sebastian Saavedra 1
T4 Ed Carpenter 1
T4 Simon Pagenaud 1
T4 Juan Pablo Montoya 1

Appearances in the Firestone Fast Six
1 Ryan Hunter-Reay 4
T2 Scott Dixon 3
T2 Will Power 3
T2 James Hinchcliffe 3
T2 Helio Castroneves 3
T2 Jack Hawksworth 3
T7 Simon Pagenaud 2
T7 Josef Newgarden 2
T9 Takuma Sato 1
T9 Marco Andretti 1
T9 Sebastien Bourdais 1
T9 Tony Kanaan 1
T9 Sebastian Saavedra 1
T9 Mike Conway 1
T9 Juan Pablo Montoya 1
T9 Ryan Briscoe 1
Indy 500 postscript

by Brian Carroccio
Tuesday, May 28, 2013


Tony Kanaan was a very popular Indy 500 champion
With three laps remaining Sunday I was absolutely, 100% sure how the 97th running of the Indianapolis 500 would end. 

Second-place Tony Kanaan would make easy work of leader Ryan Hunter-Reay on the impending restart.  Kanaan, of course, is famous for his proficiency on restarts, plus Hunter-Reay was in the unenviable position of leading, and restart leaders had been sitting ducks all day. 

After battling with Kanaan, Hunter-Reay would be an easy overtake for Munoz, who would then have the advantage of the draft, and about two and a half laps or so to catch Kanaan. 

This, to me, was the perfect amount of time, as Munoz would be able to hunt down and pass Kanaan, without Kanaan having the chance to pass back. 

Yes, as the field was about to take the green flag, I was convinced the stars had aligned for the 21 year-old rookie from Colombia.

And although we had no idea whether the racing gods shine on Munoz, there was good reason to presume they would not be with Kanaan, who had seen his fair share of misfortune at the Speedway.  Ditto of for Marco Andretti, who came to the restart fourth behind Munoz.

Of course, the racing gods can be quite fickle. 

As expected, Kanaan shot past Hunter-Reay into turn one, with Munoz doing the same, slotting into second.  However, unexpectedly, another caution would come out as defending champion Dario Franchitti hit the wall between turns 1 and 2.  The race would anticlimactically end under the yellow, with Kanaan, scoring an incredibly captivating first victory at Indy.   

Munoz finished second, and would be denied a chance to run down Kanaan.  Certainly the talented young Colombian was disappointed with the outcome.  However, if the month of May was any indication Munoz's day will come, maybe sooner than later. 

However, yesterday was all about Kanaan.  Always competitive at Indy, close on numerous occasions, Kanaan finally closed the deal at Indy car racing's most hallowed ground.  Below, we will cover Kanaan's popular victory, the entertaining race's anticlimactic conclusion and a host of other topics.


Tony Kanaan and team co-owner Jimmy Vasser
There isn't a lot I can add to what has been and will be said about Kanaan.  Clearly, part of Kanaan's appeal is many see him as one who has "paid his dues," in rising to the top of the sport.  Already, many have outlined Kanaan sleeping on the floors of race shops as he climbed the racing ladder, and more recently, his battles to secure sponsorship, to stay in the sport.

What I will say is Kanaan's victory yesterday, although not a direct parallel, reminds me a lot of the late Dan Wheldon's victory two years ago. 

Remember, both Wheldon and Kanaan had been extremely successful, championship winning drivers with the sport's top teams.  Both had lost their rides with those teams, left on less than favorable terms, and fallen on somewhat difficult times.  Both managed to catch on with lesser renowned teams, and raise those teams level of performance. 

Also, before the victory at Indy neither driver had managed to win in nearly three years.  In fact, both drivers had won previously at Iowa prior with nearly a three year drought before winning Indy.  And while neither Kanaan nor Wheldon had been exactly forgotten, both had become somewhat  overlooked.  Lastly, both were incredibly popular champions within the IndyCar community. 

Unfortunately, we never got to see whether Wheldon's victory would have resurrected his career, as we imagined it might after his victory.  However, it will be interesting to see what sort of second act the Indy victory launches for the lovable Brazilian. 


Marco Andretti got to parade across the finish line under yellow, robbed of another shot at victory
Kanaan's victory denied his former protege, Marco Andretti an opportunity to score his first win at the Brickyard.  Andretti, of course, had a strong car in 2012 , leading a race high 59 laps, yet was unable to win the race. With a strong car again yesterday, Andretti finished fourth. 

Now, the convenient narrative, will be that the Andretti Curse at Indianapolis continues. Of course, the Andretti Curse is well known at Indianapolis, something we outlined last week.  However, chalking Marco's failure to break through yesterday to the curse, greatly misses the point: this is a completely different driver than the one we saw one year ago.

Remember, Andretti dominated that race early before losing the handling of the car.  Under pressure, he ultimately crashed late in the race, when he had fallen from contention. 

So far this year, Andretti is a changed man.  The only driver to finish in the top-10 in all five races, Andretti now leads the series standings.  And in a year in which consistency is going to win the title, no one has driven as level-headed so far as Marco. 

The Finish:

A yellow flag finish in this year's Indy 500 robbed fans of seeing what would have been an incredible finish between Kanaan, Munoz, Hunter-Reay and Andretti.  Instead we all got to watch a 'parade' across the finish line instead of knowing who was the best man on that day. When tied, all sports go into overtime so as not to rob the fans of knowing who the true winner was. A green-white-checkered finish is auto racing's version of overtime. As popular as Tony Kanaan is, on Sunday May 26th the paying customers were robbed of seeing a fight to the finish.  Instead what we saw was what we see at any parade we watch - a procession across the line.  Maybe the Indy 500 parade held each Saturday before the race should be switched to Sunday in place of the 500.  As long as it pays a big purse the drivers could wave to the crowd in single file formation sitting in 33 pace car replicas.
Franchitti's accident denied young Andretti the chance to make a run at Kanaan in the closing laps.  It also marked the fourth straight year IndyCar's showcase event ended under a caution (people forget the caution came out in 2011 mere seconds before Wheldon crossed the finish line at the end of that wild race). 

Predictably, yesterday's less than ideal finish resulted in cries for a NASCAR style green-white-checker finish.  Perhaps, just as predictably, the anti-green-white-checker chorus was equally, if not more vociferous in claiming the practice to be laughable hoax. 

The reality of the situation is that IndyCar is probably damned if they do, damned if they don't.  If things are kept the same, races will continue to finish under caution.  If they adopt a green-white-checker type finish, they would for the sake of the show, be altering something fundamental to the race: the predetermined distance, which becomes a circumstantial, moving target.

For that reason, I am very much opposed to the green-white-checker format.  However, if there is a need to implement an "end under green," policy, the red flag a la Fontana 2012 would be preferable.  This allows for the cleanup of the track before giving another green flag finish a go, without altering the race distance.

Of course, this policy would have imperfections as well.  For example, you could not red flag a race with less than two laps to go.  There would have to be a clear point, where the race is official, something that would be need to be decided in advance by IndyCar.  While the red flag at Fontana was an unpopular decision, I thought the failure there was not the policy itself, rather not clearly articulating the policy, in advance. 


Speaking of an inability to articulate, ABC turned in a typical uninspiring broadcast yesterday.  Of course, ABC has long been lampooned for its indifferent and at times, downright unprofessional coverage of IndyCar. 

While I could publish a lengthy expose outlining ABC's mistakes and follies, I will spare everyone the futility.  For one, it would take too long, and second, ABC's mistakes and uninspired coverage are merely a symptom of the network's arrogance and blithe indifference to the sport that saw a record 68 lead changes and the fans cheering all race long. Compare that to the snoozefest we saw in Charlotte and the Coca Cola 600.

Also, while it pains me to say, the simple fact remains: ABC/ESPN is not going anywhere.  Yes, with the exclusive network broadcast rights to IndyCar through 2018, ABC is the only network presence IndyCar has.  Further, yesterday's race marks the beginning of what is IndyCar's most important television stretch in years. 

Yes, with Indy yesterday, network races this coming Saturday and Sunday in Detroit, followed by a prime-time Texas race on ABC, now is the time IndyCar must make hay.  And can yesterday's race bring viewers to the set next Saturday afternoon in Detroit?  Will the benefit of the same time slot bring those Saturday viewers to the set the following day?  And will three races on the same network in 13 days help IndyCar draw a sizable television audience for the Texas prime time race?  And will that help IndyCar draw viewers to the set for Iowa two weeks after that?

Hard to say.  But no matter how painful ABC can be, this unique Indy-Detroit doubleheader-Texas prime time race is the sport's best television opportunity in years to build some traction with their television audience.

Did yesterday's broadcast do anything to help that?  Hard to say.  But what can be said with some certainty is for all that is wrong with ABC, the reality is IndyCar is lucky to have them, and not the other way around.

Brian Carroccio

Brian lives in Rockville, MD, and is an IndyCar Columnist for  You can email him at and follow him on Twitter @BrianC_AR1

Feedback can be sent to

Go to our forums to discuss this article