for your iPhone
for your iPad
IndyCar

IndyCar Links

2015 Schedule

2015 IC Rule Book

2015 IC Engine Rules

2015 IC Aero Rules

2014 Indy Lights Rules

2014 Pro Mazda Rules

2014 USF2000 Rules

2014 Drug Policy

2015 Teams

2014 Scanner Freq

Race Car Comparison

Lap Time Comparison

History CART/IRL Split


2015 Standings
After Indy 500
Rank Driver Points

1. Juan Pablo Montoya 272
2. Will Power 247
3. Scott Dixon 211
4. Helio Castroneves 206
5. Graham Rahal 204
6. Josef Newgarden 173
7. Sebastien Bourdais 161
8. Charlie Kimball 160
9. Marco Andretti 151
10. Tony Kanaan 147
11. Simon Pagenaud 142
12. Ryan Hunter-Reay 130
13. James Hinchcliffe 129
14. Carlos Munoz 122
15. Takuma Sato 106
16. James Jakes 99
17. Gabby Chaves 99
18. Luca Filippi 85
19. Jack Hawksworth 76
20. Stefano Coletti 75
21. Simona de Silvestro 66
22. JR Hildebrand 57
23. Sebastian Saavedra 47
24. Sage Karam 45
25. Francesco Dracone 38
26. Ryan Briscoe 36
27. Townsend Bell 32
28. Carlos Huertas 31
29. Alex Tagliani 27
30. Justin Wilson 25
31. Conor Daly 23
32. Pippa Mann 16
33. Rodolfo Gonzalez 10
34. James Davison 10
35. Tristan Vautier 10
36. Oriol Servia 10
37. Ed Carpenter 10
38. Bryan Clauson 10
39. Buddy Lazier 0

Manufacturers
1. Honda 441
2. Chevrolet 336
Texas underscores what is right with IndyCar

by Tim Wohlford
Friday, June 07, 2013

Advertisement

Justin Wilson won last year for Dale Coyne
Ah yes, it’s time for Texas again.  And once again, Texas is a case study in all that is good in IndyCar – and all that can go wrong.

Bluntly stated, I came to Texas last year fully prepared to write about bad news.  After all, it was the first high-banked super speedway race with the new Dallara chassis, and the first high-banked track race after the Vegas event the previous fall had taken the life of Dan Wheldon. 

And as CART fans remember, in 2001 drivers suffered vertigo due to the speed of the cars – which was, arguably, the beginning of the end for that series.

However, a strange thing happened – it was one of the best IndyCar races ever.  The cars were competitive without racing in the dreaded pack.  The better drivers went to the lead, although a few bemoaned having to race there at all. 

First Scott Dixon, then Graham Rahal, dominated before hitting the wall, handing the victory to a surprised Justin Wilson in front of a stunned crowd.

So what happened?  In a word, IndyCar changed the aero formula, and got it right.  Working with Firestone and the engine manufacturers, IndyCar tries to provide a safe, entertaining and cost-effective race.  (And yes, this means that I believe that IndyCar blew it for the 2011 Vegas race.) 

Some Indy drivers, as well as some AutoRacing1 editors, lobbied for lower down force on the big ovals for years.  This effectively turns them into mechanical grip cars instead of down force grip cars, and at the Texas race last year, they gave it a try.  And, it worked, as it did for California later in the season. 

“The cars are safer than they used to be” due to a lack of pack racing comment Helio Castroneves this morning.

So, fast forward to this year.  Although IndyCar is keeping last year’s spec for the high-banked races, IndyCar is nothing if it isn’t a place where all old ideas seem to be dragged out of storage once in a while.  Now we’re hearing new IndyCar management talking once again about “aero kits” for, well, sometime in the future. 

And even worse yet, talk of “new track records.”  The concerns are obvious – will IndyCar be able to strike a balance between safety, cost and “the good show” if it has multiple aero configurations?

And if IndyCar tries for a “new track record” at Texas... well, it’s just not possible.

Feedback can be sent to feedback@autoracing1.com

Go to our forums to discuss this article