for your iPhone
for your iPad
IndyCar

IndyCar Links

2014 Schedule

2014 IndyCar Rules

2014 Indy Lights Rules

2014 Pro Mazda Rules

2014 USF2000 Rules

2014 Drug Policy

2014 Teams

2014 Scanner Freq

Race Car Comparison

Lap Time Comparison

History CART/IRL Split


2014 Standings
After Pocono
Driver Standings

1 Will Power 446
2 Helio Castroneves 446
3 Simon Pagenaud 402
4 Juan Pablo Montoya 391
5 Ryan Hunter-Reay 388
6 Carlos Munoz (R) 340
7 Marco Andretti 325
8 Scott Dixon 297
9 Ryan Briscoe 285
10 Sebastien Bourdais 271
11 Tony Kanaan 267
12 James Hinchcliffe 266
13 Mikhail Aleshin 263
14 Justin Wilson 253
15 Charlie Kimball 239
16 Jack Hawksworth 227
17 Carlos Huertas (R) 224
18 Josef Newgarden 220
19 Graham Rahal 202
20 Sebastian Saavedra 196
21 Takuma Sato 189
22 Mike Conway 152
23 Ed Carpenter 138
24 Oriol Servia 88
25 Kurt Busch (R) 80
26 JR Hildebrand 66
27 Sage Karam (R) 57
28 James Davison (R) 34
29 Jacques Villeneuve 29
30 Alex Tagliani 28
31 Luca Filippi 24
32 Townsend Bell 22
33 Pippa Mann 21
34 Martin Plowman (R) 18
35 Buddy Lazier 11
36 Franck Montagny 8

Rookie of the Year
1 Carlos Munoz 340
2 Mikhail Aleshin 263
3 Jack Hawksworth 217
4 Carlos Huertas 204
5 Kurt Busch 80
6 Sage Karam 57
7 James Davison 34
8 Martin Plowman 18

Wins
T1 Ryan Hunter-Reay 2
T1 Will Power 2
T1 Simon Pagenaud 2
T4 Mike Conway 1
T4 Helio Castroneves 1
T4 Carlos Huertas 1
T4 Ed Carpenter 1
T4 Juan Pablo Montoya 1

Podium Finishes
T1 Will Power 5
T1 Helio Castroneves 5
2 Ryan Hunter-Reay 4
T3 Carlos Munoz 3
T3 Juan Pablo Montoya 3
T6 Marco Andretti 2
T6 Simon Pagenaud 2
T8 Mike Conway 1
T8 Carlos Huertas 1
T8 Scott Dixon 1
T8 Tony Kanaan 1
T8 Graham Rahal 1
T8 Charlie Kimball 1
T8 Ed Carpenter 1
T8 Jack Hawksworth 1
T8 Mikhail Aleshin 1

Lap Leaders:
1 Will Power 348
2 Helio Castroneves 174
3 Ryan Hunter-Reay 165
4 Ed Carpenter 116
5 Tony Kanaan 79
6 Juan Pablo Montoya 74
7 Takuma Sato 67
8 James Hinchcliffe 56
9 Simon Pagenaud 53
10 Jack Hawksworth 32
11 Scott Dixon 27
12 Marco Andretti 22
13 Justin Wilson 20
14 Sebastian Saavedra 14
15 Graham Rahal 10
16 Mike Conway 8
17 Josef Newgarden 8
T18 Oriol Servia 7
T18 Carlos Huertas 7
19 Ryan Briscoe 5
20 Mikhail Aleshin 4
21 Alex Tagliani 3
22 Sebastien Bourdais 2

Entrant Points
Pos. # Entrant Points
1 12 Team Penske 446
2 3 Team Penske 446
3 77 Schmidt Peterson Hamilton Motorsports 402
4 2 Team Penske 391
5 28 Andretti Autosport 388
6 34 Andretti Autosport/HVM 340
7 25 Andretti Autosport 325
8 9 Target Chip Ganassi Racing 297
9 20 Ed Carpenter Racing 290
10 8 NTT Data Chip Ganassi Racing 285
11 11 KVSH Racing 271
12 10 Target Chip Ganassi Racing 267
13 27 Andretti Autosport 266
14 7 SMP Racing 263
15 19 Dale Coyne Racing 253
16 83 Novo Nordisk Chip Ganassi Racing 239
17 98 BHA/BBM with Curb-Agajanian 227
18 18 Dale Coyne Racing 224
19 67 Sarah Fisher Hartman Racing 220
20 15 Rahal Letterman Lanigan Racing 202
21 17 KV/AFS Racing 196
22 14 A.J. Foyt Racing 189
23 16 Rahal Letterman Lanigan Racing 112
24 26 Andretti Autosport 88
25 21 Ed Carpenter Racing 66
26 22 Dreyer and Reinbold 57
27 33 KV Racing Technology 34
28 5 Schmidt Peterson Motorsports 29
29 68 Sarah Fisher Hartman Racing 28
30 6 KV Racing Technology 22
31 63 Dale Coyne Racing 21
32 41 A.J. Foyt Racing 18
33 91 Lazier Partners Racing 11

Finishing Average
1 Helio Castroneves 5.81
2 Kurt Busch 6.00
3 Will Power 6.09
4 Simon Pagenaud 6.72
5 Sage Karam 9.00
6 J.R. Hildebrand 10.00
T7 Scott Dixon 10.18
T7 Carlos Munoz 10.18
9 Juan Pablo Montoya 10.45
10 Ryan Hunter-Reay 10.72
11 Ryan Briscoe 11.75
12 Marco Andretti 12.125
13 Carlos Munoz 12.375
T14 Oriol Servia 12.5
T14 Justin Wilson 12.5
16 Alex Tagliani 13.0
17 Sebastien Bourdais 13.25
18 Charlie Kimball 13.625
19 Mike Conway 13.66
T20 Jacques Villeneuve 14.0
T20 Ed Carpenter 14.0
22 Carlos Huertas 14.25
23 Mikhail Aleshin 14.875
24 James Hinchcliffe 15.125
T25 Takuma Sato 15.5
T25 Jack Hawksworth 15.5
27 Sebastian Saavedra 15.75
28 James Davison 16.00
29 Josef Newgarden 16.375
30 Graham Rahal 16.625
31 Martin Plowman 20.5
32 Franck Montagny 22.0
33 Pippa Mann 24.0
34 Townsend Bell 25.0
35 Buddy Lazier 32.0

Pole Positions
T1 Takuma Sato 2
T1 Will Power 2
T1 Helio Castroneves 2
T4 Ryan Hunter-Reay 1
T4 Sebastian Saavedra 1
T4 Ed Carpenter 1
T4 Simon Pagenaud 1
T4 Juan Pablo Montoya 1

Appearances in the Firestone Fast Six
1 Ryan Hunter-Reay 4
T2 Scott Dixon 3
T2 Will Power 3
T2 James Hinchcliffe 3
T2 Helio Castroneves 3
T2 Jack Hawksworth 3
T7 Simon Pagenaud 2
T7 Josef Newgarden 2
T9 Takuma Sato 1
T9 Marco Andretti 1
T9 Sebastien Bourdais 1
T9 Tony Kanaan 1
T9 Sebastian Saavedra 1
T9 Mike Conway 1
T9 Juan Pablo Montoya 1
T9 Ryan Briscoe 1
Maybe there's something to this 'IndyCar U' idea

by Brian Carroccio
Wednesday, April 10, 2013

Advertisement

If IndyCar can connect with universities the potential benefits are huge
Well, if I'm ever having trouble coming up with a creative April Fools' Day joke, I now know exactly what to do: formulate an innovative idea, call it breaking news, and suggest the idea's brilliance originated was the work of IndyCar.  If only, I could ever figure out how to leak said joke in advanceā€¦.

All kidding aside, AutoRacing1.com caused something of a stir last week with an "exclusive" April Fools' Day column advocating a "university tie-in," concept for IndyCar and Indy Lights.  While the column was of course, a joke, the idea presented was a rather intriguing one, which garnered a fair amount of discussion. Predictably, some loved the concept, whereas others dismissed it as preposterous. 

And in fairness, the column spoke in somewhat general terms, leaving numerous questions unanswered.  For example, considering the myriad of brooh-hah-hahs over the years regarding engine leases, could the series establish a reasonable procedure to determine which team would align with which university?  It's very easy to imagine someone crying bloody murder, if Roger Penske seeking the "unfair advantage," somehow aligned his team with the university boasting the best engineers.

Further, how would students be selected to participate in the program?  Could you enroll for IndyCar 101, as you would say English Literature, Psychology or Economics? While I'm all for introducing IndyCar engaging a broader audience, having the audience build race cars seems at least on the surface, a little drastic.  After all, racing cars are highly technical machines designed by professional engineers with years of experience, not college students looking to fill semester hours.

Now, is my thinking that such an endeavor would be "academic," in nature, presumptuous?  Or because it is a competitive endeavor would a university's connection to racing qualify as an intercollegiate sport and thus fall under the watch of the utterly incompetent NCAA?  If so, would the NCAA impose sanctions if say, a Star Mazda driver swapped victory trophies for tattoos? 

Speaking of drivers, how would they be selected? Would drivers have to attend Ohio State, Michigan, Notre Dame or Purdue to participate? Would said drivers compete in entirely separate classes, as the column indicted or alongside other professional drivers? And would fans be upset if universities constantly had "ride-buyers," filling their seats? 

Perhaps, the most interesting question would be, who exactly is going to pay for such an endeavor?  Certainly many of us are very wise when it comes to spending other people's money.  Further, I'm not sure I see the direct incentive for the universities, nor do I see how they would necessarily recoup an adequate return on their investment.  At the very least, I can't imagine "let's talk about going racing," has been on the agenda for many university board meetings in recent years.

In short, AR1's proposal was not, nor did it intend to be comprehensive.  Further, it does raise numerous questions that at this point have no definitive answer.  Now, I'm not going to say the details of costs, university/team assignment, or arguing what students should and should not design are trivial.  However, I will say that outright dismissing the idea over such matters, greatly misses the point, and overlooks the limitless opportunity this proposal offers.
 
See, the proposal to have universities involved in the design of Indy cars is all about introducing IndyCar to a larger audience, engaging another constituent, which so happens to be a younger constituent at that.  Further, as we have witnessed in other sports, colleges boast the added benefit of already-built-in followings.

Remember, Indy car racing, in its various forms, has spent decades trying to reach a broader audience.  How often do you hear, "the racing is great," or "IndyCar drivers are more friendly and engaging that other pro athletes"?  While those of us that follow the sport closely understand this, television ratings and other metrics show the message is not reaching a broader audience.  For whatever reason, our beloved sport has not expanded beyond its passionate niche following, an aging niche at that.  Sadly, IndyCar is significantly disconnected from the public at large.

Well, I can tell you something that many people feel incredibly connected to: their alma maters.

Yes, IndyCar tying itself to universities creates an opportunity, albeit an indirect one, to reach a broader audience.  While there are numerous such examples, let's use one university from last week's article, Ohio State (great livery on the OSU Dallara by the way).



Say Ohio St. is producing aero-kits for Indy Lights, and has an affiliation with a two-car team in the series.  The cars have some sponsorship, but are generally speaking outfitted in Buckeye scarlet and gray.  And heck, maybe there would even be an opportunity for Ohio St. sponsors say, Nike, to sponsor a car, but I digress.

Now, randomly select any American IndyCar venue, and I will guarantee there is a local Ohio State alumni chapter.  Ditto for other major universities.  But keeping with Ohio St., I'll bet that formally, or informally, an OSU group gathers for football games, basketball games, and other Buckeye events, somewhere near every American IndyCar venue.

And let's say a Buckeye-alum in Baltimore thought about buying a ticket the year before but passed.  Maybe, he was too busy.  Maybe, he felt no real connection to the event.

However, the next year he sees Ohio State will be fielding two cars in the Indy Lights race.  Further, he sees that the local Buckeye alumni chapter will have a tent at the race supporting the scarlet and gray cars.  All of a sudden, that Buckeye alum, who was previously undecided, now has a reason to go.  He will join fellow Buckeye alums, in rooting on the Scarlet and gray.  And if you get that person through the gate, you open up all sorts of possibilities.

Maybe, he hears the group is gathering next summer in Pocono, about a three-hour drive from his home, and is compelled to go.  Maybe, at one point during the weekend he meets Ryan Hunter-Reay, Will Power, or Helio Castroneves and becomes a fan, who buys an RHR, Power, or Castroneves hat.  Maybe, during that Baltimore weekend, he learns that the series will be competing again in five weeks on NBC Sports (well, that's another matter.)

Still, the point remains: The university tie-in gives IndyCar a unique opportunity to engage another constituent.  It builds off a connection already in place to potentially get others interested in the sport.  And while there will be many who will flock to the track simply for the beer, the pretty girls, and the opportunity to see some old pals with the backdrop of a unique spectacle, there are those who will become die-hards. At the very least, IndyCar is giving itself the opportunity to connect to a broader audience. 

And there's more. 

Take the Ohio State example, and then think about Michigan, Purdue, Notre Dame, Indiana, UCLA, Texas, Alabama and numerous others universities.  Now, think about the possibility of Ohio State and Michigan cars battling at Mid-Ohio or Detroit.  Imagine Cal-Berkeley battling Stanford at Sonoma.  What about Johns Hopkins battling Maryland in Baltimore's Inner Harbor?  Consider the frenzy you might create if an Alabama car battled an Auburn car wheel-to-wheel in the closing laps at Barber. And how cool would it be for a driver or crewman to wear a Bear Bryant pattern-styled hat?

When people visit Ohio State, Michigan, Stanford, or Alabama, they may see a Lights or Star Mazda car showcased in Columbus, Ann Arbor, Palo Alto and Tuscaloosa.  In other words, if this idea were to take off in such a way, IndyCar will have created a platform, in which, its product is showcased, for free.   

In short, AR1's proposal to connect IndyCar to universities, offers countless, immeasurable ways to broaden IndyCar's scope and reach. 

Of course, it must be said that the above talk is by and large, hypothetical.  And as mentioned earlier, there would be significant issues to address, and this is not a matter of get Ohio State and Michigan to paint a car, send a few engineering students over and go racing.

Rather, this is an incredibly complex matter that deals with issues of safety, finances, the details of amateur/professional status, and so on.  Further, such an endeavor would have to be done in a way that is beneficial to both parties. 

But this can be beneficial to both parties.  For IndyCar, the potential to engage not one constituent, but many constituents with already passionate followings, is clearly there.  Simply put, such a scenario makes for countless potential ticket-buyers, countless new fans. And when you consider the limitless possibilities of the idea, it becomes downright foolish to dismiss.

Feedback can be sent to feedback@autoracing1.com

Go to our forums to discuss this article