for your iPhone
for your iPad

IndyCar Links

2014 Schedule

2014 IndyCar Rules

2014 Indy Lights Rules

2014 Pro Mazda Rules

2014 USF2000 Rules

2014 Drug Policy

2014 Teams

2014 Scanner Freq

Race Car Comparison

Lap Time Comparison

History CART/IRL Split

2014 Standings
After Toronto
Driver Standings

Driver Standings
1 Helio Castroneves 533
2 Will Power 520
3 Ryan Hunter-Reay 464
4 Simon Pagenaud 462
5 Juan Pablo Montoya 428
6 Scott Dixon 387
7 Carlos Munoz (R) 384
8 Tony Kanaan 380
9 Marco Andretti 375
10 Sebastien Bourdais 358
11 Ryan Briscoe 344
12 James Hinchcliffe 330
13 Charlie Kimball 317
14 Justin Wilson 311
15 Mikhail Aleshin 298
16 Josef Newgarden 288
17 Jack Hawksworth (R) 287
18 Graham Rahal 266
19 Carlos Huertas (R) 265
20 Takuma Sato 234
21 Sebastian Saavedra 229
22 Mike Conway 218
23 Ed Carpenter 168
24 Oriol Servia 88
25 Kurt Busch (R) 80
26 JR Hildebrand 66
27 Sage Karam (R) 57
28 Luca Filippi 46
29 James Davison (R) 34
30 Jacques Villeneuve 29
31 Alex Tagliani 28
32 Townsend Bell 22
33 Pippa Mann 21
34 Martin Plowman (R) 18
35 Buddy Lazier 11
36 Franck Montagny 8

Rookie of the Year
1 Carlos Munoz 384
2 Mikhail Aleshin 298
3 Jack Hawksworth 287
4 Carlos Huertas 265
5 Kurt Busch 80
6 Sage Karam 57
7 James Davison 34
8 Martin Plowman 18

T1 Ryan Hunter-Reay 3
T2 Will Power 2
T2 Simon Pagenaud 2
T2 Mike Conway 2
T5 Helio Castroneves 1
T5 Carlos Huertas 1
T5 Ed Carpenter 1
T5 Juan Pablo Montoya 1
T5 Sebastien Bourdais 1

Podium Finishes
T1 Will Power 6
T1 Helio Castroneves 6
3 Ryan Hunter-Reay 5
4 Tony Kanaan 4
T5 Carlos Munoz 3
T5 Juan Pablo Montoya 3
T7 Marco Andretti 2
T7 Simon Pagenaud 2
T7 Mike Conway 2
T10 Carlos Huertas 1
T10 Scott Dixon 1
T10 Josef Newgarden 1
T10 Graham Rahal 1
T10 Charlie Kimball 1
T10 Ed Carpenter 1
T10 Jack Hawksworth 1
T10 Mikhail Aleshin 1
T10 Sebastien Bourdais 1
Manufacturer Standings:
1 Chevrolet 2056
2 Honda 1042

Lap Leaders:
1 Will Power 353
2 Tony Kanaan 326
3 Helio Castroneves 241
4 Ryan Hunter-Reay 167
5 Ed Carpenter 116
6 Juan Pablo Montoya 74
7 Takuma Sato 67
8 Sebastien Bourdais 60
9 Simon Pagenaud 59
10 James Hinchcliffe 56
11 Scott Dixon 44
12 Jack Hawksworth 32
13 Justin Wilson 25
14 Marco Andretti 22
T15 Mike Conway 15
T15 Josef Newgarden 15
17 Sebastian Saavedra 14
18 Graham Rahal 10
T19 Oriol Servia 7
T19 Carlos Huertas 7
21 Ryan Briscoe 5
22 Mikhail Aleshin 4
23 Alex Tagliani 3

Entrant Points
Pos. # Entrant Points
1 3 Team Penske 533
2 12 Team Penske 520
3 28 Andretti Autosport 464
4 77 Schmidt Peterson Hamilton Motorsports 462
5 2 Penske Motorsports 428
6 9 Target Chip Ganassi Racing 387
7 20 Ed Carpenter Racing 386
8 34 Andretti Autosport/HVM 384
9 10 Target Chip Ganassi Racing 380
10 25 Andretti Autosport 375
11 11 KVSH Racing 358
12 8 NTT Data Chip Ganassi Racing 344
13 27 Andretti Autosport 330
14 83 Novo Nordisk Chip Ganassi Racing 317
15 19 Dale Coyne Racing 311
16 7 Schmidt PetersonMotorsports 298
17 67 Sarah Fisher Hartman Racing 288
18 98 BHA/BBM with Curb-Agajanian 287
19 15 Rahal Letterman Lanigan Racing 266
20 18 Dale Coyne Racing 265
21 14 A.J. Foyt Racing 234
22 17 KV/AFS Racing 229
23 16 Rahal Letterman Lanigan Racing 134
24 26 Andretti Autosport 88
25 21 Ed Carpenter Racing 66
26 22 Dreyer and Reinbold 57
27 33 KV Racing Technology 34
28 5 Schmidt Peterson Motorsports 29
29 68 Sarah Fisher Hartman Racing 28
30 6 KV Racing Technology 22
31 63 Dale Coyne Racing 21
32 41 A.J. Foyt Racing 18
33 91 Lazier Partners Racing 11

Finishing Average
1 Helio Castroneves 5.38
T2 Kurt Busch 6.00
T2 Will Power 6.00
4 Simon Pagenaud 6.92
5 Sage Karam 9.00
6 Scott Dixon 9.61
7 J.R. Hildebrand 10.00
8 Tony Kanaan 10.23
9 Ryan Hunter-Reay 10.38
T10 Juan Pablo Montoya 11.15
T10 Sebastien Bourdais 11.15
12 Ryan Briscoe 11.38
13 Justin Wilson 11.92
14 Carlos Munoz 12.00
15 James Hinchcliffe 12.46
16 Oriol Servia 12.5
17 Marco Andretti 12.69
18 Ed Carpenter 12.75
19 Alex Tagliani 13.0
20 Charlie Kimball 13.23
21 Takuma Sato 13.46
22 Mikhail Aleshin 13.61
23 Jacques Villeneuve 14.0
24 Mike Conway 14.66
25 Graham Rahal 15.0
26 James Davison 16.0
27 Carlos Huertas 16.07
28 Josef Newgarden 16.92
29 Sebastian Saavedra 17.0
30 Jack Hawksworth 17.16
31 Luca Filippi 18.50
32 Martin Plowman 20.5
33 Franck Montagny 22.0
34 Pippa Mann 24.0
35 Townsend Bell 25.0
36 Buddy Lazier 32.0

Pole Positions
T1 Takuma Sato 2
T1 Will Power 2
T1 Helio Castroneves 2
T4 Ryan Hunter-Reay 1
T4 Sebastian Saavedra 1
T4 Ed Carpenter 1
T4 Simon Pagenaud 1
T4 Juan Pablo Montoya 1
T4 Scott Dixon 1
T4 Sebastien Bourdais 1

Appearances in the Firestone Fast Six
1 Ryan Hunter-Reay 5
T2 Helio Castroneves 4
T2 Will Power 4
T3 James Hinchcliffe 3
T3 Scott Dixon 3
T3 Jack Hawksworth 3
T7 Simon Pagenaud 2
T7 Josef Newgarden 2
T7 Tony Kanaan 2
T7 Sebastien Bourdais 2
T11 Takuma Sato 1
T11 Marco Andretti 1
T11 Sebastian Saavedra 1
T11 Mike Conway 1
T11 Juan Pablo Montoya 1
T11 Ryan Briscoe 1
T11 Luca Filippi 1

Qualifying Average
1 Helio Castroneves 5.53
2 James Hinchcliffe 6.90
3 Ed Carpenter 7.00
4 Luca Filippi 7.66
5 Simon Pagenaud 7.69
6 Will Power 7.76
7 Scott Dixon 8.84
8 J.R. Hildebrand 9.00
9 Sebastien Bourdais 9.76
10 Carlos Munoz 10.3
11 Tony Kanaan 10.53
12 Ryan Hunter-Reay 10.61
13 Juan Pablo Montoya 10.84
14 Takuma Sato 11.69
15 Kurt Busch 12.0
16 Marco Andretti 12.61
T17 Josef Newgarden 12.92
T17 Ryan Briscoe 12.92
19 Justin Wilson 13.0
20 Jack Hawksworth 14.5
21 Mike Conway 14.66
22 Mikhail Aleshin 14.84
23 Graham Rahal 15.38
24 Sebastian Saavedra 16.53
25 Charlie Kimball 17.15
26 Carlos Huertas 17.84
27 Franck Montagny 21.0
28 Pippa Mann 22.0
29 Alex Tagliani 24.0
30 Martin Plowman 24.5
31 Townsend Bell 25.0
32 Jacques Villeneuve 27.0
33 James Davison 28.0
34 Sage Karam 31.0
35 Buddy Lazier 33.0
Maybe there's something to this 'IndyCar U' idea

by Brian Carroccio
Wednesday, April 10, 2013


If IndyCar can connect with universities the potential benefits are huge
Well, if I'm ever having trouble coming up with a creative April Fools' Day joke, I now know exactly what to do: formulate an innovative idea, call it breaking news, and suggest the idea's brilliance originated was the work of IndyCar.  If only, I could ever figure out how to leak said joke in advanceā€¦.

All kidding aside, caused something of a stir last week with an "exclusive" April Fools' Day column advocating a "university tie-in," concept for IndyCar and Indy Lights.  While the column was of course, a joke, the idea presented was a rather intriguing one, which garnered a fair amount of discussion. Predictably, some loved the concept, whereas others dismissed it as preposterous. 

And in fairness, the column spoke in somewhat general terms, leaving numerous questions unanswered.  For example, considering the myriad of brooh-hah-hahs over the years regarding engine leases, could the series establish a reasonable procedure to determine which team would align with which university?  It's very easy to imagine someone crying bloody murder, if Roger Penske seeking the "unfair advantage," somehow aligned his team with the university boasting the best engineers.

Further, how would students be selected to participate in the program?  Could you enroll for IndyCar 101, as you would say English Literature, Psychology or Economics? While I'm all for introducing IndyCar engaging a broader audience, having the audience build race cars seems at least on the surface, a little drastic.  After all, racing cars are highly technical machines designed by professional engineers with years of experience, not college students looking to fill semester hours.

Now, is my thinking that such an endeavor would be "academic," in nature, presumptuous?  Or because it is a competitive endeavor would a university's connection to racing qualify as an intercollegiate sport and thus fall under the watch of the utterly incompetent NCAA?  If so, would the NCAA impose sanctions if say, a Star Mazda driver swapped victory trophies for tattoos? 

Speaking of drivers, how would they be selected? Would drivers have to attend Ohio State, Michigan, Notre Dame or Purdue to participate? Would said drivers compete in entirely separate classes, as the column indicted or alongside other professional drivers? And would fans be upset if universities constantly had "ride-buyers," filling their seats? 

Perhaps, the most interesting question would be, who exactly is going to pay for such an endeavor?  Certainly many of us are very wise when it comes to spending other people's money.  Further, I'm not sure I see the direct incentive for the universities, nor do I see how they would necessarily recoup an adequate return on their investment.  At the very least, I can't imagine "let's talk about going racing," has been on the agenda for many university board meetings in recent years.

In short, AR1's proposal was not, nor did it intend to be comprehensive.  Further, it does raise numerous questions that at this point have no definitive answer.  Now, I'm not going to say the details of costs, university/team assignment, or arguing what students should and should not design are trivial.  However, I will say that outright dismissing the idea over such matters, greatly misses the point, and overlooks the limitless opportunity this proposal offers.
See, the proposal to have universities involved in the design of Indy cars is all about introducing IndyCar to a larger audience, engaging another constituent, which so happens to be a younger constituent at that.  Further, as we have witnessed in other sports, colleges boast the added benefit of already-built-in followings.

Remember, Indy car racing, in its various forms, has spent decades trying to reach a broader audience.  How often do you hear, "the racing is great," or "IndyCar drivers are more friendly and engaging that other pro athletes"?  While those of us that follow the sport closely understand this, television ratings and other metrics show the message is not reaching a broader audience.  For whatever reason, our beloved sport has not expanded beyond its passionate niche following, an aging niche at that.  Sadly, IndyCar is significantly disconnected from the public at large.

Well, I can tell you something that many people feel incredibly connected to: their alma maters.

Yes, IndyCar tying itself to universities creates an opportunity, albeit an indirect one, to reach a broader audience.  While there are numerous such examples, let's use one university from last week's article, Ohio State (great livery on the OSU Dallara by the way).

Say Ohio St. is producing aero-kits for Indy Lights, and has an affiliation with a two-car team in the series.  The cars have some sponsorship, but are generally speaking outfitted in Buckeye scarlet and gray.  And heck, maybe there would even be an opportunity for Ohio St. sponsors say, Nike, to sponsor a car, but I digress.

Now, randomly select any American IndyCar venue, and I will guarantee there is a local Ohio State alumni chapter.  Ditto for other major universities.  But keeping with Ohio St., I'll bet that formally, or informally, an OSU group gathers for football games, basketball games, and other Buckeye events, somewhere near every American IndyCar venue.

And let's say a Buckeye-alum in Baltimore thought about buying a ticket the year before but passed.  Maybe, he was too busy.  Maybe, he felt no real connection to the event.

However, the next year he sees Ohio State will be fielding two cars in the Indy Lights race.  Further, he sees that the local Buckeye alumni chapter will have a tent at the race supporting the scarlet and gray cars.  All of a sudden, that Buckeye alum, who was previously undecided, now has a reason to go.  He will join fellow Buckeye alums, in rooting on the Scarlet and gray.  And if you get that person through the gate, you open up all sorts of possibilities.

Maybe, he hears the group is gathering next summer in Pocono, about a three-hour drive from his home, and is compelled to go.  Maybe, at one point during the weekend he meets Ryan Hunter-Reay, Will Power, or Helio Castroneves and becomes a fan, who buys an RHR, Power, or Castroneves hat.  Maybe, during that Baltimore weekend, he learns that the series will be competing again in five weeks on NBC Sports (well, that's another matter.)

Still, the point remains: The university tie-in gives IndyCar a unique opportunity to engage another constituent.  It builds off a connection already in place to potentially get others interested in the sport.  And while there will be many who will flock to the track simply for the beer, the pretty girls, and the opportunity to see some old pals with the backdrop of a unique spectacle, there are those who will become die-hards. At the very least, IndyCar is giving itself the opportunity to connect to a broader audience. 

And there's more. 

Take the Ohio State example, and then think about Michigan, Purdue, Notre Dame, Indiana, UCLA, Texas, Alabama and numerous others universities.  Now, think about the possibility of Ohio State and Michigan cars battling at Mid-Ohio or Detroit.  Imagine Cal-Berkeley battling Stanford at Sonoma.  What about Johns Hopkins battling Maryland in Baltimore's Inner Harbor?  Consider the frenzy you might create if an Alabama car battled an Auburn car wheel-to-wheel in the closing laps at Barber. And how cool would it be for a driver or crewman to wear a Bear Bryant pattern-styled hat?

When people visit Ohio State, Michigan, Stanford, or Alabama, they may see a Lights or Star Mazda car showcased in Columbus, Ann Arbor, Palo Alto and Tuscaloosa.  In other words, if this idea were to take off in such a way, IndyCar will have created a platform, in which, its product is showcased, for free.   

In short, AR1's proposal to connect IndyCar to universities, offers countless, immeasurable ways to broaden IndyCar's scope and reach. 

Of course, it must be said that the above talk is by and large, hypothetical.  And as mentioned earlier, there would be significant issues to address, and this is not a matter of get Ohio State and Michigan to paint a car, send a few engineering students over and go racing.

Rather, this is an incredibly complex matter that deals with issues of safety, finances, the details of amateur/professional status, and so on.  Further, such an endeavor would have to be done in a way that is beneficial to both parties. 

But this can be beneficial to both parties.  For IndyCar, the potential to engage not one constituent, but many constituents with already passionate followings, is clearly there.  Simply put, such a scenario makes for countless potential ticket-buyers, countless new fans. And when you consider the limitless possibilities of the idea, it becomes downright foolish to dismiss.

Feedback can be sent to

Go to our forums to discuss this article