Lauda says Brawn may be sorry to lose Button
“Button being worthy or unworthy is the wrong approach,” the Nicky Lauda stated in an interview with the official F1 website. “A world champion is a world champion. You might argue about the manner in which he won, but history has shown that in some years you have guys who win everything, and then you have guys – and I count myself among these – who win with a half point lead in the last race. There are many ways to win a championship.
“He put in a good season – starting very strong at the beginning to forge ahead and then keeping the lead through difficult times of constantly losing points, but still staying in front. He was 'nail-biting' himself to the title – at least from the outside. It is hard to say why he was losing out to Rubens – someone running on the same equipment – in the second half of the season.
“In the end it's a pointless discussion, because he was not the only one running on a bumpy performance curve; Sebastian Vettel also had his share of poor results. In that scenario of ups-and-downs, Jenson was able to keep enough points to maintain his lead – that's why he ended up as champion and not somebody else. Yes, the 60th Formula 1 World Champion is a worthy champion.
“I am sure that Ross was not completely satisfied with Jenson's performance in the second half of the season, but if Mercedes ends up with someone not as good as Jenson, then they've drawn the short straw. Ferrari's pairing of Alonso/Massa and McLaren with their two British champions will be very, very competitive. We have also seen how Vettel and Webber egg each other on to top performances, so the 'Silver Arrows' will be confronted with competitors with top driver line-ups. I would not have an idea who they should take; in my opinion all the top drivers are already signed.”
Insisting that he was 'not really' surprised by Button's defection to Woking – what he describes as 'a true Ron Dennis move' – Lauda went on to suggest that it might not only be Brawn who regrets the unexpected divorce, predicting that Mercedes Grand Prix will be a force to be reckoned with indeed in the years to come. All they need now, he adds, is a top-line driver line-up to match.
“You can argue back and forth about Jenson, but one thing is undeniable,” asserted the 60-year-old, who lifted the world championship laurels for Ferrari in 1975 and 1977 and for McLaren in 1984. “What Ross formed out of the bankrupt Honda estate, in a cloak-and-dagger operation, to dominate all the 'big boys' in the paddock, was truly phenomenal. That has never happened before in Formula 1. That is the real sensation of the season, and their winning the constructors' championship is highly deserved.
Mercedes made a very smart move by acquiring a majority stake in Brawn GP, to follow the concept of cost-cutting that [former FIA President] Max [Mosley] had begun – to run a team with a reduced budget of $100 million per year by 2011. Brawn GP is the team already fit for that kind of financial downgrade, whereas many others will have a hard 2010 season being competitive on the track and simultaneously working their way down on the economic side.
“By reviving the real Mercedes 'Silver Arrows' – which means an excellent marketing tool for the car manufacturer – Mercedes stays involved with F1 at a very reasonable cost-benefit ratio. Never forget, they've got the world championship team, [so] the takeover was a masterly achievement.
“Now it is important to proceed in this same manner by having a very close look at the issue of the driver line-up. With the Button departure, [Nico] Rosberg is at the moment their only driver – a good man for sure, but good men get even better with a team-mate that gives them a hard time 24 hours a day. They have to be very careful now in their selection, trying to get a top man for the second cockpit. Otherwise the advantage will be on Red Bull's and Vettel's side – and they might find themselves riding on Red Bull's coat tails.”