Australian Grand Prix race winner Giancarlo Fisichella and Red Bull
racer David Coulthard talk of the Melbourne race as well as this
weekend’s Malaysian Grand Prix.
Q: A question for you both: do you feel that your performance in
Melbourne was fairly indicative of your overall capabilities? Was
that where you expected to be?
Giancarlo FISICHELLA: Well, first of all, it was a weekend which was
affected by Saturday’s first qualifying where the weather was the
main factor of the weekend. There I have been lucky and it was easy
for me to manage the gap on Sunday morning and I started on pole.
Then, people like Michael, my team-mate, Rubens, the McLarens, they
started a little bit further back so it was a bit of a difficult
race for them but somewhere, sometime in the middle of the race, all
the drivers showed how competitive their cars were and themselves so
I think we are in good shape. We won the race because we were quick
and because we wanted to be competitive and we are quite optimistic
for this weekend.
David COULTHARD: Well, I would say the same about the qualifying.
Obviously we had a window which helped us in first qualifying, which
inevitably changed people’s strategies for Sunday morning but we
know we were in amongst the majority in terms of our strategy –
maybe we could have been a couple of laps longer which certainly
would have slowed us down a bit in second qualifying but
nonetheless, our basic pace during the weekend was closer to the
fastest times than we maybe would have expected so I think
generally – putting to one side where we finished as a team in the
points – I think our overall pace is better than where they finished
with the Jaguar car, and therefore it wouldn’t be a surprise if we
have opportunities again to score points, but under normal running
circumstances you would expect us to be behind the big four teams.
Q: It is, obviously, a new team in ownership. Where do you see it
lacking? You’ve been with McLaren and Williams; what does your
current team, Red Bull Racing, still need do you think?
DC: Well, all the obvious things. There’s no problem with the people
that are involved, but you need stability and investment to develop
the technology. OK, regulations have changed again for this year a
little bit, and every year you’ve got to react to those changes but
in either maintaining a partnership with the current engine supplier
or establishing a long term partnership with a manufacturer is
obviously important and understanding that as soon as possible and
increasing the investment in all areas so that the team can keep
pace of development with the other teams. So for me, that’s where we
were at race one and it was a dry race and at various points, as
Giancarlo says, you got to see what people’s pace was so fast
forward to race nineteen: are we still maintaining that position? Of
course the dream is to reduce the gap to the big teams, but why
should we, with a smaller factory, smaller resources be able to do
that? So it’s about reducing the potential increase in lap time that
you could see during the course of the season.
Q: When you look at your lap time you were just over a second off
fastest lap of the race; that must have been fairly satisfactory.
DC: Yeah, because I would believe that Fernando’s lap was a
charging, coming through the field, doing everything he could,
whereas Giancarlo was on a maintenance program because he had the
race won from the first corner and it was just about maintaining
that position. For my race, I certainly think I could have pushed a
little bit harder at certain points but there was a little bit of
uncertainty on my part as to what to expect the evolution of the car
to be, because that’s the first full distance I’ve done. In testing
we didn’t quite get there, so better to be a little bit cautious and
maintain the position rather than being silly and running wide
somewhere. It’s a long-winded way of saying I could have been closer
to the fastest lap time.
Q: So you’re quite optimistic.
DC: I think that Christmas came early for the team to get two cars
in the points. Circumstances played their part but nonetheless,
that’s what a Grand Prix throws up. We’re closer to the quickest
pace than I would have expected - than I potentially expected -
going to Melbourne, so that gives us all a boost to get on with the
job of putting things in place in the future.
Q: Giancarlo, you won by just over six seconds from somebody who
had come up from eleventh place on the grid to second. How much did
you have in reserve?
GF: Quite honestly, quite a lot. I was very calm during the race.
The only problem for me was to get through the first corner and be
the leader. As soon as I did that, I was very calm, very convinced.
The car balance was really good. Right at the end, Rubens was
catching me, particularly because I lost four or five seconds behind
Jacques. Some of my engineers told me to push a little bit. I did a
25.9s which was a very good lap time and I wasn’t at the limit,
honestly, so I was very comfortable in the car and to win the race
with six seconds to Rubens was OK. The important thing was to be
first. I won the race. I’m really confident. I’m happy.
Q: Now you’ve been back to Europe. Is that a little bit of a
disadvantage, do you think?
GF: No. The schedule for me was to go to the Maldives, but
unfortunately I had a problem with my son who was in hospital with
an infection. Now he’s OK, he’s out of hospital, but that’s the
reason why I went back to Europe.
Q: But you’ve been here since Tuesday…
GF: Yes, I’ve been here since Tuesday morning, I landed at 7 o’
clock in Kuala Lumpur and I started a bit of a program of training
with the trainers. I’m happy. I feel OK. It’s really hot, it’s going
to be a very tough race physically and mentally but I’m in good
condition.
Q: What’s the great challenge of this circuit, particularly
looking at the tire situation?
GF: It’s a difficult situation, physically, mentally. It’s a
difficult circuit for the tires, first of all because it’s going to
be very hot and then it’s quite abrasive asphalt, tarmac. So for the
race, it’s important to keep a good pace, but it’s important to save
the tires, especially the last ten laps will be very interesting.
It’s important to be concentrated, not to make mistakes and then you
score a result.
Q: David, look at this circuit, the extremes of temperature, the
difficulty with the tires as Giancarlo was saying. Is it a situation
whereby if it works here, it will be OK for the rest of the season?
DC: Well, you think so with the majority of people’s engines being
into the second phase of their life in warm conditions. Tire-wise, I
think if you look at the choices of the majority then whereas if you
look at what we raced here in the past, with prime and option then
both the prime and option that are here are quite conservative, so I
wouldn’t expect any big problems with the tires. Yes, for sure, heat
is an issue, but they can simulate hot engines by putting lots of
tank tape on the radiators in winter testing. It’s not quite the
same, but in terms of running the engine hot you can do that, but
it’s all the other parts for which this is the ultimate test.
Q: (James Allen – ITV): Giancarlo, you mentioned about your son.
How close did you come to not actually doing the race at all? Was
there a time at which you were thinking you might have to go back to
Europe before the race?
GF: Yeah, I knew that problem just before second qualifying. I was a
bit worried, but when I spoke with my wife, she told me ‘don’t
worry, we’re in the hospital but the worst moment has passed and we
have to be here just because the doctor wants to see him for a
couple of days.’ Obviously I was really nervous and disappointed
about that, but as soon as the lights went out, I was just
concentrated on the race.
Q: (Marc Surer – Premiere TV): David, you always go at the
circuit in a Mercedes car. Now you are driving for a team which is
not related to a manufacturer. With what car are you arriving now?
DC: Well, Mercedes. I was part of the family for a long time and
Petra, who as you know looks after friends of the family, so I will
be using a Mercedes during the course of this year. It’s a brand new
one as well, they’re very brave.
Q: (David Tremayne – The Independent): DC, a couple of questions
for you: how happy are you within the team and how important is it
for you as a driver to be in a team where it appears everyone loves
you and is giving you maximum support?
DC: I guess that’s because they don’t all know me that well at the
moment, if you think they all love me! I don’t really know that many
people in the team is the truth so far because my winter testing was
with the test team and obviously it’s all the race team (whom I’m
working with now). So I’m still getting to know a lot of the people
but you know it’s some of the people who I worked with 14 years ago
at Paul Stewart Racing. So, some of the oldest relationships I have
in motor sport are within what is Red Bull Racing now and it
obviously started with PSR. So I feel comfortable. I just want to do
my job and enjoy myself and go home. I don’t need to feel the
banging the head against the brick wall frustration that sometimes
has been there in the past. Why do I want to do that through choice?
I actively pursued continuing my Grand Prix career because I enjoy
the thrill of going racing on a Sunday. The whole Grand Prix weekend
is a main source of pleasure to me, even on the bad days, so I
enjoyed the good fortune we had as a team in Melbourne and expect
that normal order will be resumed for the majority of the remaining
Grand Prix, but it still means we can do our jobs and give
direction, and give an opinion on what needs to be worked on.
Q: (David Tremayne – The Independent): You said in Melbourne that
the racer’s instinct kicked in at the first corner, and you may be
aware that you’ve been shit-canned quite a lot in certain areas of
the media as being over the hill and everything else. The
performance you gave there reminded a lot of people that’s probably
an incorrect view. What would you say to your critics after a race
like Melbourne?
DC: You know, people having an opinion on my as a driver is… they’re
right and we as professional sports people earn our pennies because
of the public interest and the link between the racing, the media
and feeding the public, so I don’t have a problem with people
deciding that on the face of it, armed with the information that
they have, their opinion is this.
But the reality is, of course, that you can’t pass judgment - or
full judgment – unless you’re armed with all the facts, because
otherwise you’d never have trials for court cases for anything.
You’d just walk in and go ‘guilty f—k ‘em, lock ‘em up’. I’m armed
with all the facts, through my eyes because I’ve experienced the
emotions involved with being a Grand Prix driver and other people in
the team are armed with all the facts with their view. To the
outside world, depending on how close the relationship they have
with either me or other members of the team, then they get more or
less of the facts.
This is a long-winded way of not really answering the question in
that I don’t have anything to say to the critics because I’m not
doing it for them. And yes, the media, you play an important part in
our sport and you can build a driver and you can break a driver, but
you know I probably did more damage on my own, through the
difficulties I had with one lap qualifying, than any single person
just saying ‘oh yeah, he should go off and do something else.’ I
don’t want to do something else.
Q: (Azrul Ananda – Jawa Pos): David, you spent so many years with
McLaren which is a very tidy team, very neat team, everything is so
organized, you tuck your shirts in. Now you’re in Red Bull which is
more relaxed; how do you feel about the difference?
DC: Well, I think McLaren’s T-shirts are untucked now. Life is
becoming a little bit less formal generally, but yes, of course
McLaren has a very regimented way of operating internally and
externally, but it’s people who are on the inside, and when you know
those people then it’s as friendly as any other environment and I
certainly don’t judge a team by how accessible it is to the outside
world, because frankly speaking, when you’re doing a job, the
minimum distractions you have – which means less people about the
team – then the better it is, you can just concentrate. I’m sure
Giancarlo doesn’t mind me saying that I thought it was quite telling
in Melbourne, when I was leaving the paddock, I popped into Renault
just to say well done on his victory, and he was sitting alone in a
room. I can totally relate to why he would be doing that, because he
was wanting to savor the moment for himself, not being out there
being asked lots of questions and being harangued by people. The
inner motivation, the inner voice – sometimes you have to talk to
yourself a little bit to enjoy it, and not having too many people
around is a good thing.
Q: (James Allen – ITV): Giancarlo, in the build-up to this
season, everyone has been talking about this extraordinary battle
between Raikkonen and Montoya, the team mate’s duel that everyone
has been savoring the prospect of, but the reality is that the
battle between you and Fernando is every bit as exciting and every
bit as intense. What does it feel like from the inside? Obviously
Melbourne wasn’t a typical race, and he’s saying ‘I don’t count
Melbourne because of what happened’ but what do you feel in terms of
the battle you’re having with him?
GF: Aah, it’s going to be tough. Honestly, it’s nice to work with
Fernando. He’s a very a nice guy, there’s a very good friendship
between me and him. We work together which is very important for the
team and I think he’s one of the best drivers in Formula One. He’s
quick and consistent during the race, so it’s going to be
interesting to see how it is at the end of the season between me and
him. But for sure it’s going to be tough.
Q: (Rami Tuisku – Ilta Sanomat): David, how does it feel now you
don’t have a Finnish driver as your teammate? (Laughter)
DC: I have to buy my own vodka now. (Laughter) I’m enjoying the
relationship I’m having with Christian (Klien) and Tonio (Liuzzi)
because they’re younger guys and developing their lives; so we’ve
been training together and doing things that I never did with Mika
or with Kimi. At the end of the day, it’s great if you can get along
with your teammate because it just makes the whole weekend more
pleasurable, but ultimately you’re out there trying to do your own
thing.
Q: (Wolfgang Rother – Premiere TV): Michael Schumacher was
heavily criticized after his move against Nick Heidfeld (in
Melbourne). Some media wrote about harsh Rambo-style driving and
there might be some aggressive feelings among the drivers now, and
there might be even some come-back in the next race. What is your
opinion about the move and the feeling?
DC: I did watch the race afterwards and my opinion of
it, and I do
have the benefit of being in the car – you’ve got to remember that
he, sitting in the car, all he can see is this little mirror to make
a judgment where the other car is, so it’s not as clear in the car
as it is from the outside. From the outside, he does appear to
squeeze, once Nick had already put himself towards the inside, would
be the obvious observation to make and then once Nick is on the
grass, and there is only one way he’s going is into the side of
Michael. What we don’t see clearly from the television was… did Nick
just brake too late on the dust and was he always going to run into
him? Even if Michael hadn’t squeezed him onto the grass, would he
still have hit him, but just at the apex?
So I think clearly Michael did move but I think there’s a bit of
over-reaction saying that he’s Rambo and there’s a big push-back.
When I see him, and when we talk in the drivers’ briefing, the GPDA
meeting on Friday evening, then that will be one of the things that
I’ll raise and we’ll talk about it and I’m sure Michael will give
his opinion but ultimately it gives you all something to talk about,
doesn’t it? It was great Giancarlo winning but having an incident
adds to the spectacle.
For me, what was more questionable was the
marshals running across the track. At one point there were about
four or five marshals running from where, several years ago, a
marshal was killed, across the racing line to give him (Schumacher)
a push, for a privileged service - he’d obviously paid his valet
parking ticket beforehand. I’m not saying you don’t want cars on the
track, because when there’s only 20 cars out there, you need them
all running but I know how difficult that corner is. If a driver did
make a mistake, you could, even with a yellow flag, you could end up
sliding off into somewhere.
GF: I think maybe Michael’s maneuver was to disturb Nick Heidfeld.
Maybe Nick was braking a bit too late and he’s gone onto the gravel
and he couldn’t stop the car. At the end of the race the marshal
(stewards) didn’t give them any advertising (warning) so I think it
was OK.
Q: (Heinz Pruller – ORF TV): Giancarlo, before the season began,
a lot of people said you would be the ideal driver for the
championship this year because you use the tires better etc. Could
you say you confirmed this in Melbourne and this is your own
feeling?
GF: Well, we are just at the first race, at the start of the season.
Yes, I won the first race but we still have 18 races to go. I feel
confident to be quick, to fight for the podium, to fight to win a
race sometimes because I have a great car, I have a great team and I
feel confident, physically and mentally. So if we continue to be
competitive, if we continue to do the right development on the
package, I think we can try to win the championship, why not?
Press Release FIA
Feedback can be sent to
feedback@autoracing1.com
Go to our
forums
to discuss this article