Editorial

Next Generation Champ Car: A call for F1 tires

 by Mark Cipolloni
March 2, 2004

Go to our forums to discuss this article


The next generation Champ Car tire should be Bridgestone's F1 tire

The days of getting a Champ Car crossed up and hangin' it out around a racetrack are gone. What we see now is more sanitized, faster, and less entertaining.  The biggest culprit are the tires.  As Champ Car tires (and Toyota Atlantic tires) moved to low-profile sidewalls the fans were cheated out of one of the more entertaining aspects of our sport.  Today the cars follow each other like railroad cars on a railroad train.  Is the next generation Champ Car also heading for a train wreck, or will the new OWRS regime see the light?

When you watch F1 cars you see the rear ends shift around through the turns. This gives them a much faster look than the planted look that you get from the Champ Cars. They appear more "on the edge" which makes them more exciting to see be it a qualifying lap or a race stint. The give in the tires as they whip through a turn is a racier appearance than the "on rails" look of the Champ Cars at any speed!  Let's examine why.

The low-profile current generation "radial" tires demand that the drivers keep them at small slip angles. A bias ply tire from the '80s made its peak cornering load at about 12 degrees slip angle and it had a broad range where it will produce reasonable side force. A modern radial makes its peak cornering force at about 4 degrees and the drivers have a very small range of where it will produce peak cornering force. The yaw angle of the car is going to end up to be about 1/2 that of the tire slip angle.

The old cars drifted around at about 5-7 degrees yaw, and the modern ones drift around at 1.5 to 2 degrees yaw. If we were looking for one thing to point a finger at what has made motor racing less entertaining to watch, especially for the general public, it's been the move to wider radial tires with shorter sidewalls. Even on a radial, the narrower the tire, the more slip angle you get and the more sidewall on the tire, the more slip angle you get. This is probably best viewed by looking at a dirt track tire and its high sidewalls.  You never see a low profile dirt track tire.

A sprint car tire with low air pressure and a big sidewall gives you a lot of warning when it's going to break loose, and has a large operating window. When the current low-profile Champ Car tire gives up, it does so very abruptly and saving it is a hell of a challenge. The best Champ Car drivers get the tire to an impending slide, but make certain to not step over the line.


You can visibly see the higher profile F1 tires flex under load, allowing bigger slip angles and a larger operating window before breaking loose.

Let's back up. The reason that the tire manufacturers make tires that run at small slip angles is because it's faster. It gives the driver a knife edge to drive on, but if he does everything correctly, then the tire runs cooler and doesn't have as much rolling drag in the corners (i.e. it isn't being deformed as much and it isn't soaking up big chunks of engine power). Particularly when there's a tire war, tire companies make a tire that has very high capabilities, but is difficult to drive. In 1998 when F-1 first introduced grooved tires, the sliding and drifting was a lot more. It made for a great show. As Michelin and Bridgestone have fought each other in a tire war, that drifting and sliding has been reduced. It's still a grooved tire, so they dance around more and do get visibly sideways more than Champ, Atlantic, or F3000 cars.

Champ Cars (and Atlantic for that matter) aren't in a situation where a tire war is an issue. Bridgestone knows that they can produce anything and still say they won the Long Beach Grand Prix, or whatever race every Sunday. What they then shift their concentration to is safety and marbles. They want to make sure that no tires delaminates and gives them a black eye on TV, and the sanctioning bodies try to get them to eliminate marbles, which they blame for no passing.

Both of these are valid, but in addition to these, I think they need to produce a tire that operates at large slip angles. Take whatever slip angle that the tires operate at right now (the manufacturer will know through their testing) and double it. Make the tire have a broad slip angle curve and let the cars have some serious yaw angles as they get through the corners. Who doesn't like watching old footage of Jimmy Clark drifting around Silverstone?


Click and enlarge and notice Coulthard sawing at the wheel and the opposite lock he puts on his F1 car.  Opposite lock, big yaw and big slip angles - racing isn't supposed to look like a railroad train

All this is easy to write, but more difficult to implement. As I said before, high slip angles soak up big chunks of engine power. This engine power is turned into heat inside the tire. When a tire runs hotter it is more likely to delaminate, blister, explode, etc. Bridgestone wouldn't be interested in having any of the above happen and neither would anyone else. One thing that hotter running tires also lends itself to is to tire degradation through the run. Rubber has a lot of oil in it. If you get it hot, the oil burns off and the tire chemically changes. The hotter the tire, the quicker the oil burns and the more the tire changes through a run.

I don't think this is a bad thing. It will make the drivers play chess a bit more instead of trying to throw in qualifying laps for 2 hours straight. If someone does try to run at 100% all the time, they will burn their tires off and everyone will pass them. Passing is good for the sport.

There were rumors that OWRS had gotten Bridgestone to produce a harder tire this year, but they were later refuted. I really think that's the wrong way to go. So does NASCAR, who went softer this year. When tires don't degrade through the run, the drivers do end up trying to run at qualifying pace for the whole race. When they try this, they crash. It's just a law of averages thing. At qualifying pace you are taking a lot of chances. Sooner or later you're going to get it wrong. Maybe Senna, Schumacher, or Montoya could do it, but you're talking about 3 guys over the last 20 years. These are very special men. Even they wouldn't be able to do it every weekend and get away with it.

Getting more sidewall is going to be a sticky thing to push now, it has to wait for the next generation Champ Cars. If you get more sidewall, then you get less wheel.   Less wheel means you have to repackage everything inside the wheel.  Smaller brake discs, smaller brake calipers, smaller uprights, etc.  From a heat management angle alone it would probably necessitate carbon brakes.

However, with that said, I think it's not only valid, but damn near mandatory that Champ Car adopt the higher profile F1 tires.  In fact the wheels and tires should be exactly the same as F1 so that both Michelin and Bridgestone have something to start from for Champ Car.  With the F1 size tires we will see more movement in the rear-end of the cars.   It will also better prepare a Champ Car driver for F1 should they get the chance. 

Engaging the general public and letting them see what the driver is dealing with from their seat in the stands or on the couch is something that OWRS really has to concentrate on.  Because if we're in for another generation of railroad car racing, they might be in for a train wreck!

The author can be contacted at markc@autoracing1.com

Go to our forums to discuss this article

Author

 
Other Editorials

Champ Car's Minardi 2-seater is the ultimate ride

For Alex Figge and PCM it's baptism by fire

A tribute to Alfred J. Cipolloni

Champ Car owners move to silence critics

Establishing a firm foundation for Champ Car

One-on-one with Champ Car President Steve Johnson

J.R. Hildebrand is one American going places in a hurry

What's new for Champ Car for 2007 - Part 1

Champ Car positions itself for international expansion

Paul Stoddart confirms interest in Champ Car

An inside look at Champ Car TV production

Ho-Pin Tung wants to be Champ Car's first Chinese driver

Stephen King explains Justin Wilson's novel Investor's Club

One-on-one with American sensation AJ Allmendinger

Champ Car moving forward without the IRL

One-on-one with Paul Tracy

Bruce Delahorne explains CDW's sponsorship in Champ Car

One-on-one with Justin Wilson

Champ Car bosses won't be bullied

Part 2: NASCAR/ISC get dirty in Phoenix, out to destroy Open Wheel

Part 1: NASCAR/ISC get dirty in Phoenix, out to destroy Open Wheel

The Rahals: Like father, like son

Why and IRL/Champ Car merger will be a big boost for the sport

Headless Open Wheel Racing appears doomed

Richard Lyons looking at Champ Car for his next challenge

We salute the champions of 2005

Is Jay Howard the next Ayrton Senna?

Interview with Grand-Am President Roger Edmondson

Otaru, Japan Champ Car race moving closer to reality

Champ Car's global appeal may ride on mimicking the Team Australia concept

Champ Car's Surfers Paradise race promoter "gets it"

Champ Car cements another brick in its foundation

Custom built Champ Cars and Indy Cars

Interview with RuSPORT Team President Jeremy Dale

Conspiracy Theory: What Indy was really all about

Why the Champ Car/IRL war must end

How a Champ Car and IRL merger might work

Will the battle for Long Beach destroy its Grand Prix?

Katherine Legge has her eyes set on Champ Car

Traveling Light Media - Just what the doctor ordered

Champ Car lays out bold 3-year plan

Champ Car's 2005 driver lineup vastly improved

Hunter-Reay anxious to get racing again with new team

That sucking sound you hear is NASCAR

Feud - The story of the murder of Mickey Thompson

Yes, Blame Tony and the CART defectors too

Interview with ALMS President Scott Atherton

2005 a foundation laying year for Champ Car

Kalkhoven talks Champ Car with AutoRacing1

Kalkhoven and Forsythe buy Cosworth from Ford

Carl Russo is bullish on Champ Car

Can this be Champ Car's next-generation car

Champ Car poised for major comeback

Champ Car Race Control - the 'Hot Seat Zone'

Open Wheel Racing is in serious need of consolidation

Champ Car South of the Border, An interview with Joe Heitzler

There is an easy way for Champ Car and the IRL to unify

From airport to race track, a race within a race

The 2-seater Car is one of Champ Car's biggest assets

Why Bernie Ecclestone could, and should, buy Champ Car now

Champ Car rocks the streets of Times Square in Manhattan

Why did Fernández leave Champ Car?  Follow the money....

Next Generation Champ Car: A call for F1 tires

Coming to America?  Interview with Ralph Firman Jr.

Open Wheel Racing defeats IRL - Champ Car Series to continue

Open Wheel Racing needs a win by OWRS - Part 2

The next generation Champ Cars - Part 2

Is CART next for Villeneuve?

New deal for CART may be better than first thought

The genius of one Bernard Ecclestone

CART Champ Cars, the next generation - Part 1

Details emerging on CART race in Seoul, South Korea

CART hits a Grand Slam in Mexico City.  Now What?

Top-10 Challenges facing new CART owners

CART can still race in Europe, but will they?

For CART, time is of the essence

Making sense of CART's situation

Push-to-Pass means no more parades for CART

An interview with CART's David Clare

What did Roger Penske really mean?

CART must differentiate itself - clearly

Why turbos make for superior street and race engines

For CART, it's now or never

Chicken or the Egg?

War of the worlds

What Bernie brings to CART

CART, Driven to where?

Is it really about CART vs. IRL?

If I were Bernie

The Champ Cars and St. Pete

An informal survey of the St. Pete race attendees

Artificial Dissemination

CART, F1 coming to grips with doing business in China

Cancel the Funeral

Why CART and F1 must, and will, share a common V-10 engine

Book Review: Autocourse 2002-2003 F1 yearbook

Does CART need Michael Andretti?

2002 CART TV ratings by the numbers

Now is the time for CART to redefine its ladder system

CART gets a taste of tifosi passion in Mexico

Love affair in Mexico

Making sense out of Bernie/CART rumors

Changing of the guard?

Mom, apple pie, CART and....Formula1?

Why CART and Bernie make perfect dance partners

Miami should be a CART and ALMS kickoff party

David slays Goliath in Miami

What to make of Gurney's F1 team

Taking it to the streets, why Miami is a war zone

CART, like the Phoenix, about to rise up from the ashes

There's more than handwriting on the wall.....and here's the concrete facts

Labor Day weekend 1952...A weekend I'll never forget

Team owners show support for CART

CART still may be in cards for Villeneuve

Bryan Herta, USA's next best chance for F1

Is Paul Ricard in CART's future?

CART's real attendance numbers

Is Brands Hatch suitable for Champ Cars?

An Unappealing Appeal, George reigns in GEORGE-town

A candid conversation with Chris Pook

More than meets the eye with CART's turbo move

It's time for CART to define its own future

Key upgrades at Road America

Back-Breaking work

The rebirth of CART

The hidden costs of Indy Car racing

CART's road and street circuits are clicking with the fans

Is it sport, or a P.T. Barnum show?

IRL at Fontana - a victim of friendly fire

CART's 2003 race venues #1 in the world

Meet the Gonzalez brothers

ISC is making enemies in Miami

e-mail us:
contacts@autoracing1.com

Back to the top

AutoRacing1 is an independent internet online publication and is not affiliated with, sponsored by, or endorsed by CART Inc., NASCAR, FIA,  FedEx, Nextel, or any other series sponsor. This material may not be published, broadcast, or redistributed without permission.
User agreement & disclaimer

Copyright 1999 - 2004, AutoRacing1, Inc., Hamilton, NJ