>


Advertisement
Rumors
Rumor Rating Description
A rumor rated as 'speculation' is one that has no supporting information
A rumor rated as 'strong' is one where we received information from more than one source.
A rumor rated as 'fact' is one that has proven to be true
A rumor rated as 'false' is one that has proven to be false based on new information
These rumors are just that, RUMORS, and are not to be taken as 'fact' unless so noted.  Please visit our Hot News page for news.  If you have a rumor, or can supply more information about one listed here, e-mail us with as much supporting information as possible and we may post it. User Agreement and Disclaimer. Newer rumors supersede older ones of the same topic.  Go to our forums to discuss any rumor.
for your iPhone
for your iPad

2014 IndyCar Silly Season Page | 2014 F1 Silly Season Page (Coming)

Go to our forums to discuss this news
DATE News (chronologically)
05/15/11
f1
A stumbling block for News Corp?  One of the UK's leading competition lawyers says that a takeover of Formula One by Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation would face "concerns" due to a conflict of interest.

Paul Stone, head of competition and regulation for leading law firm Charles Russell says that "News Corporation's involvement in the bid for Formula One could attract scrutiny from the competition regulators, given News Corporation's interest in Sky."

He adds that "one of the potential concerns that our sports and media group at Charles Russell has identified would be that News Corporation might be able to influence decisions over which broadcaster is awarded rights to show the races, in order to advantage Sky."

Stone's track record is ideally suited to analyzing the implications of a possible takeover by News Corp. Before he joined Charles Russell he worked in-house at ITV, where he was head of legal affairs, regulatory and competition, and one the many high profile cases he worked on was the acquisition of BSkyB's 2006 acquisition of a 17.9% stake in ITV.

News Corp has not yet even made a bid for F1 and although it released a statement last week saying that it had formed a partnership with Italian investment fund Exor it added "there can be no certainty that this will lead to an approach to F1's current owners."

Clearly, if News Corp were to make a successful bid for F1 and then move the sport to its own channels (pay per view or otherwise) it would give it a position of dominance over its rivals. It would be in the same position if it were to offer the rights to broadcast F1 to its rivals.

If the UK's BBC broadcast a News Corp-owned F1 and the two network owners found themselves bidding to screen another sport, such as rugby, News Corp could threaten to dramatically increase the price of F1 when the BBC's contract runs out unless it pulls out of the running for the rugby.

It is precisely this kind of an advantage over its competitors (in this case knowing how much they are bidding for the rights to broadcast F1) which prevented News Corp's 39%-owned subsidiary BSkyB from buying the Manchester United football team in 1998. The UK's competition commission ruled that owning Manchester United would give BSkyB "influence over and information...that would not be available to its competitors."

Given that F1 is an entire sports series rather than just a single team, and given that an acquisition of it would attract exactly the same kind of hurdles as the planned takeover of Manchester United, it is hard to see how the deal would be cleared.  ESPN F1

Rumors Archives
2000 2001 2002 2003
2004200520062007
2008200920102011
2012201320142015

Search Rumors
Search Help

Banner 10000012