A rumor rated as 'speculation' is one that has no supporting information
A rumor rated as 'strong' is one where we received information from more than one source.
A rumor rated as 'fact' is one that has proven to be true
A rumor rated as 'false' is one that has proven to be false based on new information
These rumors are just that, RUMORS, and are not to be taken as 'fact'
unless so noted. Please visit our Hot News page for news. If you have a rumor, or can supply
more information about one listed here,
e-mail us with as
much supporting information as possible and we may post it. User Agreement and Disclaimer.
Newer rumors supersede older ones of the same topic. Go to our
discuss any rumor.
A division of disaffected groups within the Formula One paddock are purportedly considering lodging complaints with the EU Commission in reference to a perceived abuse of position of the Formula One Group (FOG) whilst formulating the new 2013-’20 Concorde Agreement.
Former Williams Chairman Adam Parr recently stated the Commission should look carefully at the “special conditions” afforded to Ferrari and Red Bull by the FOG in the distribution of revenues.
Such special conditions may fall foul of current European anti-monopoly legislation. Furthermore, if investigated, the EU may want to discern whether any parties accused of such monopolization have a market share greater than 5 percent in the Concorde agreement.
Parr left Williams in March amidst speculation he was dissatisfied with a deal that may have been brokered with Williams in the short-term, despite losing out substantially in the ability to earn greater revenues, revue rule changes and thus affect competitiveness.
Mercedes were said to be in a similarly disconsolate position to Williams until recently when they – along with Lotus and Williams – were offered a CCB (Constructors Championship Bonus Teams) seat and consequently any recriminations fell silent.
Whilst those believed to be considering a complaint to the EU commission remains unclear, its fair to say the remaining teams such as Caterham, Force India and Sauber would have every right to feel aggrieved by the way the Concorde situation has allegedly been handled and may have grounds for complaint.
Furthermore, the Formula One Group’s customers (circuit promoters, TV networks and ticket buyers) could be impinged upon by an inability for teams to be part of the decision making process. Fans want close racing and promoters require healthy competition for ticket sales, etc…
Earlier this year, the EU Commission extended an examination into financial assistance given to the Nurburgring Circuit to avoid insolvency, but whether the Commission investigates any perceived allegations remains to be seen. Nevertheless, having cleared the way for CVC partners acquisition of the Formula 1 Group in 2006 the Commission would not want egg on its face should anything contravening legislation has taken place.
Copyright 1999-2016 | AutoRacing1 is an
independent internet online publication and is not affiliated with, sponsored by, or endorsed
by IndyCar, NASCAR, FIA, Sprint, or any other series sponsor.
This material may not be published, broadcast, or redistributed without