Rumor Rating Description
A rumor rated as 'speculation' is one that has no supporting information
A rumor rated as 'strong' is one where we received information from more than one source.
A rumor rated as 'fact' is one that has proven to be true
A rumor rated as 'false' is one that has proven to be false based on new information
These rumors are just that, RUMORS, and are not to be taken as 'fact' unless so noted.  Please visit our Hot News page for news.  If you have a rumor, or can supply more information about one listed here, e-mail us with as much supporting information as possible and we may post it. User Agreement and Disclaimer. Newer rumors supersede older ones of the same topic.  Go to our forums to discuss any rumor.
for your iPhone
for your iPad

2018 NASCAR Silly Season Page | 2018 F1 Silly Season Page | 2018 IndyCar Silly Season Page

Go to our forums to discuss this news
DATE News (chronologically)
Renault has ’entire blueprint’ of the McLaren cars
The politics of espionage returned to haunt Formula One in dramatic fashion yesterday as McLaren Mercedes went on the offensive against Renault.

In a concerted attack, McLaren sought to underline that the French team's possession of McLaren technical secrets is as bad or even worse than McLaren's possession of Ferrari secrets.

A leaked briefing memo from McLaren claims Renault had more than 780 individual drawings, allegedly stolen from McLaren, on its Formula One computers that amounted to "the entire technical blueprint of the 2006 and 2007 McLaren F1 cars".

The memo also names what it calls the "Renault seven", a group of seven senior figures in the Renault design and technical team who McLaren say discussed the McLaren technical information.

The Renault chief designer is among them as is the head of research and development, the head of mechanical design, the head of transmission design and the head of vehicle performance. The leak from McLaren was being seen as an attempt to dispel the impression within the sport that the illegal transfer of technical information from McLaren to Renault is of an altogether lesser order of importance than McLaren's possession of Ferrari secrets.

McLaren's transgressions resulted in a pound stg. 50million fine by the FIA, the sport's governing body, being thrown out of this year's constructors' championship and having their 2008 car subject to long-term scrutiny. Should the same penalties be applied to Renault, many believe the team would quit.

The affair came to light in September, when it emerged Phil Mackereth, the former McLaren engineer who joined Renault in March 2006, had taken with him several floppy disks containing McLaren technical drawings. Renault has played down the importance of the drawings, claiming they covered only four "basic systems", at least one of which was obsolete. It claims that none of the information was used on its cars and that the information was immediately cleansed from the team's computer once it was discovered.

McLaren paints a very different picture. The leaked memo, which quotes from McLaren's submission to the FIA's World Motor Sport Council that is due to hear the case in Monaco on December 6, says that at the time Mackereth left McLaren, 33 files of technical information were copied on to 11 floppy disks. These were then loaded on to Renault's computer system in September, 2006.

McLaren says that the 33 files, which offered a complete technical picture of McLaren's cars in 2006 and 2007, were uploaded on to 11 Renault computers and were discussed by up to 18 Renault personnel. In their submission to the FIA, McLaren's solicitors, Baker & McKenzie, say: "It is clear that McLaren's confidential design information was knowingly, deliberately and widely disseminated and discussed within the Renault F1 design and engineering team, thereby providing them (Renault) with a clear benefit and unfair advantage."

The memo also notes that Baker & McKenzie has complained in writing to Renault's solicitors about what McLaren claims is a "cavalier attitude" on the part of senior Renault personnel during the investigation into the affair and that other responses have been "incomplete", "misleading" or "incorrect". The memo concludes with an attack on Mackereth's suggestion that he had kept some confidential McLaren technical information for "sentimental reasons". In its submission to the WMSC, Baker & McKenzie describe this as an "absurd" explanation for his actions.

The leak of the memo from McLaren and its timing is as significant as what it contains. The England-based team has resorted to radical measures to pile on the pressure, not just on Renault but on the FIA in what looks like a fairly crude attempt to try to prevent the WMSC brushing this affair under the carpet. However, only time will tell whether this could prove counter-productive. Max Mosley, the president of the FIA who has never seen eye-to-eye with Ron Dennis, the McLaren team principal, may take a dim view of McLaren's decision to leak information from their confidential submission to the WMSC. There are also other powerful voices in the sport who do not buy McLaren's version of this affair. The Australian

Rumors Archives
2000 2001 2002 2003
AutoRacing1 Inc. BBB Business Review

Search Rumors
Search Help

Banner 10000012